- #26

- 30,221

- 9,358

Ok, so you're just using highly idiosyncratic terminology.The first part - that in EPR-realistic SR one can prove Bell's theorem - is simply Bell's theorem.

Which of the premises of Bell's Theorem is violated if there is a preferred frame that is unobservable, so Lorentz invariance still holds?The quote I have given describes the preferred frame as one of the ways to solve the problem.