The relationship between angle of incline and friction force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the angle of incline and the friction force acting on a 20 kg wagon on a 15 m ramp inclined at 30°. The analysis reveals that as the incline angle increases, the normal force decreases, leading to a decrease in the maximum static friction force, which is defined as ff = μ * n. The participant initially miscalculated the friction force by assuming constant acceleration across different angles. Ultimately, it was clarified that the friction force decreases with increasing incline angle due to the reduction in normal force, contradicting the participant's initial assumption that friction would increase.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of normal force and friction
  • Knowledge of static versus kinetic friction
  • Ability to solve equations involving trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between normal force and friction in inclined planes
  • Learn about the differences between static and kinetic friction coefficients
  • Explore the concept of moment of inertia and its effect on rolling objects
  • Investigate the dynamics of objects on inclined planes using free-body diagrams
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of friction on inclined surfaces.

bijou1
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 20 kg wagon is released from rest from the top of a 15 m long plane, which is angled at 30° with the horizontal. Assuming there is friction between the ramp and the wagon, how is this frictional force affected if the angle of the incline is increased?

Homework Equations


∑Fy = n - mgcos30° = 0
∑Fx = -ff (force of friction) + mg sin 30° = ma
up = +
down = -
→ = +
← = -
ff (force of friction) = μ (coefficient of friction) * n (normal force)

The Attempt at a Solution


I approached this problem by first finding the normal force when angle θ = 30°.
Therefore, ∑Fy = n-mgcos30° = 0
⇒n = mgcos30°
⇒n = 174 N
Then I solved ∑Fy = 0 when angle θ is increased, for example when θ = 60°
Therefore, ∑Fy = n-mgcos60° = 0
⇒n = mgcos60°
⇒n = 100 N
Then, I solved ∑Fx = mgsin30° - ff = ma when θ = 30°
⇒ff = mgsin30° - ma
⇒ff = 100 - 20a
Then, I solved ∑Fx = mgsin60° - ff = ma when θ = 60°
⇒ff = mgsin60° - ma
⇒ff = 174 - 20a
For example if I designate that "a" = 2 m/s^2, then ff = 100 - 20(2) ⇒60 N when θ = 30°
and ff = 174 - 20(2) ⇒ 134 N when θ = 60°. Therefore, when angle of incline increases, friction force increases.
However, my logic is wrong. The solution is that since ff = μ * n , and if angle of incline increases, friction force decreases, since ff = μ * 174 N when θ = 30° and ff = μ * 100 N when θ = 60°. I don't know why my approach is wrong...Any help would by greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since it says 'wagon' I assume it is rolling. This implies static friction, not kinetic. (OK, it could be kinetic if the friction is low enough, but then why not specify a box instead of a wagon?)
bijou1 said:
ff (force of friction) = μ (coefficient of friction) * n (normal force)
That's not necessarily true for static friction. μsN is only the maximum value of the frictional force.
bijou1 said:
Then, I solved ∑Fx = mgsin30° - ff = ma when θ = 30°
⇒ff = mgsin30° - ma
⇒ff = 100 - 20a
Then, I solved ∑Fx = mgsin60° - ff = ma when θ = 60°
⇒ff = mgsin60° - ma
⇒ff = 174 - 20a
But these two accelerations will be different.
bijou1 said:
The solution is that since ff = μ * n , and if angle of incline increases, friction force decreases,
As I wrote above, that's not valid either. To get a valid answer you need to be told the moment of inertia of the wheels. If there's no moment of inertia then there's no frictional force.
 
bijou1 said:
I approached this problem by first finding the normal force when angle θ = 30°.
Therefore, ∑Fy = n-mgcos30° = 0
⇒n = mgcos30°
⇒n = 174 N
Then I solved ∑Fy = 0 when angle θ is increased, for example when θ = 60°
Therefore, ∑Fy = n-mgcos60° = 0
⇒n = mgcos60°
⇒n = 100 N
Right here you've solved the problem (basically). You've just shown that the normal force decreases as the angle increases. So, what must happen to the friction force as the angle increases?

bijou1 said:
I don't know why my approach is wrong...Any help would by greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Your approach is wrong because the acceleration at the different angles is not the same. You cannot just arbitrarily pick some value for "a" and assume it applies at any angle.

(Generally, you'd be asked to solve for the acceleration as a function of angle.)
 
As haruspex's answer illustrates, there are several hidden assumptions that you may be expected to make in solving this problem. Some of those assumptions may be physically unrealistic (or just plain wrong). For one: Is the wagon actually rolling? Or are you treating it as sliding down the ramp? (Your given solution implies that you are treating this as you would a block sliding--not rolling--down an incline, where kinetic friction is given by μ*N.)
 
haruspex said:
To get a valid answer you need to be told the moment of inertia of the wheels.
I withdraw that. Since you are only asked for a qualitative answer, you only need to know that the wheels have a nonzero moment of inertia, which is a reasonable assumption. So you can answer the question, but you won't get the 'book' answer. Hint: at which angle will the wheels have the greater angular acceleration?
 
Doc Al said:
As haruspex's answer illustrates, there are several hidden assumptions that you may be expected to make in solving this problem. Some of those assumptions may be physically unrealistic (or just plain wrong). For one: Is the wagon actually rolling? Or are you treating it as sliding down the ramp? (Your given solution implies that you are treating this as you would a block sliding--not rolling--down an incline, where kinetic friction is given by μ*N.)
Hi, for this particular problem, the assumption is that the wagon is treated as a block "sliding" down the ramp; therefore, like you have mentioned fk (kinetic friction) = μ * n can be used. I thought I can pick a random value for acceleration and plug it into the equation to see the relationship mathematically; however, as you have mentioned that is wrong. Since I already found that n = 174 N when θ = 30°, and n = 100 N when θ = 60° (I picked a random angle value greater than 30°) and since kinetic friction and normal force are related through the equation: fk = μ * n, I can see that when θ is decreasing, normal force increases, and so frictional force increases.
 
haruspex said:
I withdraw that. Since you are only asked for a qualitative answer, you only need to know that the wheels have a nonzero moment of inertia, which is a reasonable assumption. So you can answer the question, but you won't get the 'book' answer. Hint: at which angle will the wheels have the greater angular acceleration?
Hi, I'm not sure but I'm guessing since angular acceleration is Δω/Δt and angular speed is Δθ/Δt, if θ is increasing, angular speed is increasing; therefore, angular acceleration must also be increasing. So, I'm guessing at θ = 60°, the wheels will have the greater angular acceleration. Sorry, I am not familiar with angular acceleration yet, so please correct me. I would like to learn...Thanks.
 
bijou1 said:
Hi, I'm not sure but I'm guessing since angular acceleration is Δω/Δt and angular speed is Δθ/Δt, if θ is increasing, angular speed is increasing; therefore, angular acceleration must also be increasing.
Careful! There are two different angles here. One is the angle that the wheels will describe as they rotate; the other is the angle of the incline. Don't mix them up!

bijou1 said:
So, I'm guessing at θ = 60°, the wheels will have the greater angular acceleration. Sorry, I am not familiar with angular acceleration yet, so please correct me.
Realize that the translational acceleration of the wagon and the rotational acceleration of its wheels are related. (Assuming rolling without slipping.) Also realize that this is a bit more subtle of a problem than that of a block sliding down an incline. (Since it's a different problem, you can expect a different answer--as haruspex stated.)
 
bijou1 said:
I can see that when θ is decreasing, normal force increases, and so frictional force increases.
Yes, but I'd like to emphasise that the correct deduction is that the maximum frictional force increases as theta decreases. This will only equal the actual frictional force as long as the block slides (and you are told it does so for theta at these two angles). If theta is reduced below 30 degrees you will come to a point where the block no longer slides. From there on the actual frictional force will decrease again.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Yes, but I'd like to emphasise that the correct deduction is that the maximum frictional force increases as theta decreases. This will only equal the actual frictional force as long as the block slides (and you are told it does so for theta at these two angles). If theta is reduced below 30 degrees you will come to a point where the block no longer slides. From there on the actual frictional force will decrease again.
Since the wheels are sliding, it is assumed to have kinetic friction and so I thought it would be any constant value, not a maximum. I thought maximum frictional force referred to static friction, and since the wheels are sliding for this problem, I thought only kinetic friction mattered.
 
  • #11
bijou1 said:
Since the wheels are sliding, it is assumed to have kinetic friction and so I thought it would be any constant value, not a maximum. I thought maximum frictional force referred to static friction, and since the wheels are sliding for this problem, I thought only kinetic friction mattered.
Yes, I agreed with all that. I was just pointing out that although the first part of your statement
when θ is decreasing, normal force increases, and so frictional force increases.
is always valid, the second part ceases to apply below the critical angle because it doesn't slide. Sorry if that was already obvious to you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K