The relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy

In summary: If not, you should try to find out why, otherwise you will not understand. There is a good reason.Your first answer is not correct. For example, the mass was not given, and you cannot calculate the velocity at X. Finding velocity at "X"v2 = u2 - (2gs)v2 = 02 - (2*9.8*0.5)v2 = -9.8v = \sqrt{9.8}Here, you are assuming that the time it takes to reach X is half a second, when in fact it is not. This is where your calculation is wrong.The correct way to do it is to use the SUVAT equations, as Vagn suggested
  • #1
ThievingSix
2
0
In class it was explained that at half way between a given distance Potential energy(PE) lost equals the Kinetic energy(KE) gained. OR

PE Lost = KE Gained at 1/2 the distance.

But when i do the math for it, it does not work out. What am i missing, i understand the concept but i can't prove it? And in theory it sounds correct because of the law of conservation of energy.

Here is the situation(i made it up to prove that the statement is correct).

A stationary mass is dropped from a distance of 1m and the only force that acts upon it is the Earth's gravity, it hits the ground in 1 second and its motion is along the Y axis only. Calculate PE and KE at "X".

[PLAIN]http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/3959/diagram.png

This is what i have so far,

Distance = 1m
Time = 1s
Mass = 10kg
Acceleration = 9.8 m/s/s
Initial speed = 0 m/s
Final speed = 9.8 m/s
Force = 98N(toward's the center of the earth)
Gravitational Potential energy(mass*gravity*height) = 10*9.1*1 = 98 kgms
Potential energy at rest(mass*acceleration*displacement) = 10*9.8*1 = 98 kgms
Kinetic energy at rest(1/2 Mv2) = 1/2*10*0 = 0 kgms

This is where it gets confusing,

PE at "X" = 10*9.8*0.5(half the displacement) = 49 kgms(which should be correct)
KE at "X" = 1/2*10*4.92(velocity at "X") = 120.05 kgms

Therefore PE lost [tex]\neq[/tex] KE gained at half the distance?

I've done something wrong, but what?, I've ran through this so many times i can't even see my own error.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your velocity at point X is wrong, it should be the square root of g. You need to solve the UVAST equations for x=0.5 and then use the time taken to reach X to find your velocity at point X.
 
  • #3
ThievingSix said:
KE at "X" = 1/2*10*4.92(velocity at "X") = 120.05 kgms

Your velocity is wrong.You probably assumed that the time it took the mass to reach the x point was 0.5sec which is not right.
 
  • #4
There are several problems in the problem you have published. Firstly, "A stationary mass is dropped from a distance of 1m and the only force that acts upon it is the Earth's gravity, it hits the ground in 1 second and its motion is along the Y axis only. Calculate PE and KE at "X". " is wrong, because it wil not take a body 1 sec to fall 1 m.

Galilei's law of the free fall state, that s = 1/2*g*t^2. So in 1 sec the distance is s = ½*9,82*(1)^2 = 4,91m

You have to use this law to calculate the time used for falling s meters. (s =½ m )

s= ½*g*t^2. t => t= sqrt(2s/g) and then you have to insert this in v = g*t = g*sqrt(2s/g)=sqrt(2s*g), and you get, that the kinetic energi (and thereby the change in kinetic energy) is
Ekin= ½*m*v^2 =½*m*(2s*g) = m*s*g and that is exactly the change in potential energy by falling s meters.

The only numbers you have to know - to do your calculations - is s and m.

But you do not have to know the mass to prove your statement. Just use Galileis law for falling bodies, which comes out of Newton's second law F = m*a
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Vagn said:
Your velocity at point X is wrong, it should be the square root of g. You need to solve the UVAST equations for x=0.5 and then use the time taken to reach X to find your velocity at point X.

Yes - you always need to choose the right SUVAT equation to get what you need ONLY from what you have. You must not make 'assumptions' about values unless you have calculated. This is one of the most common problems for students starting on Motion problems. :smile:
 
  • #6
Alright this is how i got the answer, please tell me if its the right way.

I used the method Vagn suggested.

Finding velocity at "X"
v2 = u2 - (2gs)
v2 = 02 - (2*9.8*0.5)
v2 = -9.8

v = [tex]\sqrt{9.8}[/tex]

Finding KE at "X"

KE = [tex]\frac{1}{2}\times m \times v[/tex]2

KE = [tex]\frac{1}{2}\times 10 \times (\sqrt{9.8})[/tex]2

KE = 49 kgms

Therefore PE lost = KE gained at X
 
Last edited:
  • #7
proper:
since you are taking it at the half way ,
D=0.5
m=10
t= 1s and half time is 1/2 s
Acc=g=9.8
final speed=the speed half way =Vf= √9.8 if time is half
PE=mgh
Ke=1/2mV2
Pe=10x10x0.5=50
Ke=1/2x10x(√9.8)2=49.92
 
Last edited:
  • #8
ThievingSix said:
Alright this is how i got the answer, please tell me if its the right way.

I used the method Vagn suggested.

Finding velocity at "X"
v2 = u2 - (2gs)
v2 = 02 - (2*9.8*0.5)
v2 = -9.8

v = [tex]\sqrt{9.8}[/tex]

ThievingSix

Do you know where these "UVAST" equations & Galilei's law come from and why your initial, simpler, assumption is not valid?
 

What is potential energy and kinetic energy?

Potential energy is stored energy that an object has due to its position or configuration. Kinetic energy is the energy an object possesses due to its motion.

How are potential energy and kinetic energy related?

Potential energy and kinetic energy are both forms of energy that an object can possess and they are interrelated. Potential energy can be converted into kinetic energy and vice versa.

What is the formula for calculating potential energy and kinetic energy?

The formula for potential energy is PE = mgh, where m is the mass of the object, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height of the object. The formula for kinetic energy is KE = 1/2mv^2, where m is the mass of the object and v is the velocity of the object.

How does an object's mass and height affect its potential energy and kinetic energy?

An object's potential energy is directly proportional to its mass and height. This means that the greater the mass and height of an object, the more potential energy it will have. Similarly, an object's kinetic energy is also directly proportional to its mass, but is directly proportional to the square of its velocity. This means that the greater the mass and velocity of an object, the more kinetic energy it will have.

What are some examples of potential energy and kinetic energy in everyday life?

Examples of potential energy include a stretched rubber band, a book on a shelf, and a roller coaster at the top of a hill. Examples of kinetic energy include a moving car, a spinning top, and a person running.

Similar threads

  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
68
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
995
Replies
5
Views
839
Replies
5
Views
871
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
725
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top