MHB The splitting field of f over F is also the splitting field of f also over E

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Splitting
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $F\subseteq E\subseteq K$ be consecutive field extensions and $f\in F[x]$ be non-constant.
I want to show that if $K$ is the splitting field of $f$ over $F$, then $K$ is the splitting field of $f$ also over $E$.

Since $K$ is the splitting field of $f$ over $F$, we have that $f(x) = c\prod (x-a_i)^{m_i}$, where $m_i$ are non-negative integers and $(x-a_i)\in K[x]$.
Since $F\subseteq E$ we have that $f\in E[x]$. Therefore, $K$ must be also the splitting field of $f$ also over $E$.

Is this correct? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I changed something... Since $K$ is the splitting field of $f$ over $F$, we have that $f(x) = c(x-a_1)\cdots (x-a_n)$, where $c\in F, a_1, \dots a_n\in K$ and $K=F[a_1, \dots , a_n]$.

Since $F\subseteq E$ we have that $f(x) = c\prod (x-a_i)^{m_i}\in E[x]$ and $F[a_1, \dots , a_n]\subseteq E[a_1, \dots , a_n] \Rightarrow K\subseteq E[a_1, \dots , a_n]$.

Since $E\subseteq K$ and $a_i\in K$ we have that $E[a_1, \dots , a_n]\subseteq K$.

Therefore, $K=E[a_1, \dots , a_n]$.

So, $K$ is the splitting field of $f$ also over $E$.
Is this correct? Could I improve something? (Wondering)
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...