The total tension acting on a rotating rod

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total tension acting on a rotating rod as a function of its length. The approach involves defining tension as T(x) and analyzing the infinitesimal changes in tension, dT(x), across the rod's length. Participants clarify that the total tension refers to the sum of tensions at every point along the rod, emphasizing that T(x) increases with the length of the rod. The analysis is deemed correct, with the understanding that the tension at the left end of the rod is zero when the length is zero. Overall, the method of summing infinitesimal changes to derive the total tension is validated.
EddiePhys
Messages
144
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Find the total tension acting on a rod rotating about its end with an angular velocity of w as a function of its length x(length)

Homework Equations



F = ma[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



Let the function be T(x) where x is the length of the rod.
Considering an interval between x and x + dx
For an increment in dx, let the function change by dT(x)
dT(x) = T(x+dx) - T(x)
T(x+dx) is the tension acting on a rod of length x + dx
T(x) is the tension acting on a rod of length x
Therefore, dT(x) is the tension acting on the tiny element of length dx

dT(x) = dm(w^2) x
dm = ρdx

∫dT(x) = ρ(w^2)∫ xdx from T(x) = 0 at x = 0 to T(x) at x = x.
This gives me tension as a function of the length of the rod

Is what I've done correct & rigorous? Is my general approach to calculus alright or am I viewing things wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EddiePhys said:
dT(x) = dm(w^2) x
Since the right side is positive, this implies that dT is positive. Should the tension increase as x increases?

∫dT(x) = ρ(w^2)∫ xdx from T(x) = 0 at x = 0 to T(x) at x = x.
This gives me tension as a function of the length of the rod
Where should the tension be zero?
 
TSny said:
Since the right side is positive, this implies that dT is positive. Should the tension increase as x increases? Where should the tension be zero?

I'm not trying to find tension as a function of x. I'm finding the total tension acting on a rod of length x
 
OK. But the tension in the rod varies along the length of the rod. So, when you say you need the "total tension", what does that mean?

(The notation is a little confusing. You use "x" as a variable in your analysis, but you also use "x" for the total length of the rod.) [EDIT: I understand now that you are considering rods of variable length.]
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
OK. But the tension in the rod varies along the length of the rod. So, when you say you need the "total tension", what does that mean?

(The notation is a little confusing. You use "x" as a variable in your analysis, but you also use "x" for the total length of the rod.)

By total tension I mean the sum of all tensions acting at every point along the rod. I'm finding T(x), and here by x i mean the length of that rod. I basically want this function to give me the tension acting on a rod of any length for eg. T(5) would be the total tension acting on a 5m rod.
 
EddiePhys said:
By total tension I mean the sum of all tensions acting at every point along the rod.

In your analysis, you didn't sum the tensions, T. Instead, you summed the infinitesimal changes in tension dT.

If you take an arbitrary cross-section of the rod, there will be a certain value of tension, T, at that cross section. That means that the material to the left of the cross section is exerting a force T toward the left on the material to the right of the cross section, while the material to the right of the cross section is exerting the same amount of force T toward the right on the material to the left of the cross section. I'm not sure I understand what it means to sum all tensions at every point along the rod.
 
TSny said:
In your analysis, you didn't sum the tensions, T. Instead, you summed the infinitesimal changes in tension dT.

If you take an arbitrary cross-section of the rod, there will be a certain value of tension, T, at that cross section. That means that the material to the left of the cross section is exerting a force T toward the left on the material to the right of the cross section, while the material to the right of the cross section is exerting the same amount of force T toward the right on the material to the left of the cross section. I'm not sure I understand what it means to sum all tensions at every point along the rod.

dT(x) = T(x+dx) - T(x)
T(x+dx) is the total tension acting on a rod of length x + dx
T(x) is the total tension acting on a rod of length x
Therefore, dT(x) is the tension acting on the tiny element of length dx
I've simply summed these up from 0 to x
 
EddiePhys said:
dT(x) = T(x+dx) - T(x)
T(x+dx) is the total tension acting on a rod of length x + dx
At what cross section is the tension T(x+dx) acting?

Could it be that the question is asking for the tension T in the rod at the left end of the rod as shown below?
upload_2017-2-11_12-9-59.png
 
If T(x) is the tension at the left end of the rod when the rod has a total length x, then I think your analysis in your first post is OK. So, when you switch from x to x + dx, you are actually talking about two different rods (as you clearly said):
upload_2017-2-11_13-4-0.png
The difference in T(x+dx) and T(x) must provide the centripetal force for the extra mass dm of the longer rod. Your work looks correct if this was your way of looking at it. So, T(x) does in fact increase as x increases. And T(x) = 0 when x = 0.

Sorry for not seeing this sooner.

You don't need to approach it this way. In fact, you don't need calculus at all if you know the principle that the center of mass of an object has an acceleration acm given by
Fnet, external = Macm.
 
  • #10
TSny said:
If T(x) is the tension at the left end of the rod when the rod has a total length x, then I think your analysis in your first post is OK. So, when you switch from x to x + dx, you are actually talking about two different rods (as you clearly said):
View attachment 112975The difference in T(x+dx) and T(x) must provide the centripetal force for the extra mass dm of the longer rod. Your work looks correct if this was your way of looking at it. So, T(x) does in fact increase as x increases. And T(x) = 0 when x = 0.

Sorry for not seeing this sooner.

You don't need to approach it this way. In fact, you don't need calculus at all if you know the principle that the center of mass of an object has an acceleration acm given by
Fnet, external = Macm.

Okay, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K