The work integral (general question)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZanyCat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of the work integral in the context of vector calculus. Participants are exploring the formula for work, specifically the integral involving a force vector and a displacement vector.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand how to evaluate the work integral, questioning how to perform antidifferentiation with vectors and how to handle the dot product when the differential displacement is not a specific value. There is also discussion about the components of the vectors involved.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants providing insights into vector calculus and line integrals. There is a focus on understanding the relationship between the force vector and the displacement components, but no consensus has been reached on the specific evaluation method.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing the complexities of integrating vector quantities and the implications of breaking down vectors into components. There is an acknowledgment of the differences in calculation based on whether the field is scalar or vector.

ZanyCat
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I'm sure you're all familar with this formula for work, [itex] W=\int_{s_i}^{s_f} \mathrm{\vec{F}}\cdot\,\mathrm{d}\vec{s}<br /> [/itex]

I don't understand how to evaluate this integral. How do you antidifferentiate in terms of a vector? How do you evaluate the dot product when ds isn't an actual value?

Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's done with something called vector calculus, more specifically, line integrals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_integral#Vector_calculus

Depending on whether it's a scalar or vector field, it is calculated slightly differently. Nevertheless, we will do a dot product inside the integral while manipulating the integral into something more familiar, so only parallel components will count.
 
So would we do the dot product of F and delta-s? If so, that would give us a scalar value (or perhaps a function), and what would we integrate that in terms of?
 
Remember that ds can be broken down into components dx and dy just like F can be broken down into components Fx and Fy (Fx and Fy do not represent partial derivatives here).
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K