The World's Largest Computer in 1951

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computer
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2,468 replies · 236K views
I wonder how they keep it on.[/size]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
honestrosewater said:
I wonder how they keep it on.[/size]

Fish glue, i think.
 
Another quickie.

What connects, 1968 organ, 1986 motorhead.
 
Bye, bye thread :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
 
I'm still here. Does it have something to do with pipes?
 
Ooh, 1973 Sleeper?
 
honestrosewater said:
Ooh, 1973 Sleeper?

A certain lady was just satisfied :smile:
 
Or was she ?
 
Mk said:
or was shee?

there was an
o:) Mk, HRWwb is getting slow :biggrin:
 
Who's slow?

In accounting, this is the standard way of recording transactions.
 
honestrosewater said:
Who's slow?

In accounting, this is the standard way of recording transactions.
 
Did you get it??
 
By Rose, In accounting, this is the standard way of recording transactions.

:confused: Ahh, i missed this post Your looking for some thing
:!) sexy.
 
So did anyone get it? I think it's pretty easy.
 
honestrosewater said:
So did anyone get it? I think it's pretty easy.
I built one a few years back, it is still un tested. :smile:
 
:smile: Ahhh... I'm so lost. Was 1973 Sleeper wrong? Your clue was the Orgasmatron, right?
 
honestrosewater said:
:smile: Ahhh... I'm so lost. Was 1973 Sleeper wrong? Your clue was the Orgasmatron, right?

Just pulling your plonker Rose, you are correct :biggrin: next one please.
 
wolram said:
Just pulling your plonker Rose, you are correct :biggrin: next one please.
Okay, did you get this one:
In accounting, this is the standard way of recording transactions.
 
honestrosewater said:
Okay, did you get this one:
In accounting, this is the standard way of recording transactions.

double entry...?
 
Last edited:
No, thank you. I'm not into that kind of thing. :blushing:

Oh... yes, that's the answer. :biggrin:
 
honestrosewater said:
No, thank you. I'm not into that kind of thing. :blushing:

:bugeye:...is your mind always in the gutter?

Oh... yes, that's the answer. :biggrin:

oh...didn't expect that. Seemed too easy for it to be right. Does this mean I get to post one or has this just become a free for all? And I don't mean a free for all in the way you might be thinking either... :bugeye:
 
yomamma said:
you have to post one

Oh..geez...guess that will teach me to answer questions...

This will probably be way too easy for the people here...

What do MIT, princeton and electro-shock therapy have in common?
 
Townsend said:
What do MIT, princeton and electro-shock therapy have in common?
Is it dirty? :devil: Bah, I'm too tired. John Nash?
 
honestrosewater said:
Is it dirty? :devil:
:bugeye:

You need to find a partner...

Bah, I'm too tired. John Nash?

Yes...I would say it was too easy but I wouldn't want you to feel like I was putting down your intelligence...

So, how about I say...that was too easy for someone soo smart :smile:
 
Townsend said:
Yes...I would say it was too easy but I wouldn't want you to feel like I was putting down your intelligence...

So, how about I say...that was too easy for someone soo smart :smile:
Yes, I know you're easy, but who's putting what where? :eek:

You can go again. I don't like thinking of clues. Make it hard this time. :wink:
 
Sorry, I don't want to scare you away. I'll be good. o:)
 
honestrosewater said:
Yes, I know you're easy, but who's putting what where? :eek:

You can go again. I don't like thinking of clues. Make it hard this time. :wink:

oh geez...(I will pretend to ignore the make it hard comment)

Umm...ok...

What does an apple, a mollusks, a rose, and Frank Lloyd Wright have in common?

If you get this one easy then you are a genius...
 
Pearl (and Perl)?