Why is it that the Energy of a system is identified with [itex]p_0[/itex] and not [itex]p^0[/itex]?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

This is especially concerning to me in non-Minkowski metrics, such as the Schwarzschild metric, where the difference between [itex]p^0[/itex] and [itex]p_0[/itex] can be quite dramatic.

In the schwarzschild metric, we have:

[tex]p_0 = -\tilde{E}\,m[/tex]

where [itex]\tilde{E}[/itex] is energy per unit mass, and for a photon, [itex]p_0=-E[/itex]

But that means that for a massive particle,

[tex]p^0 = m\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^{-1}\tilde{E}[/tex]

and for a photon,

[tex]p^0 = \left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^{-1}E[/tex]

Clearly [itex]p_0[/itex] has been more closely related with energy than its contravariant form

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# The zeroth component of the four-momentum

Loading...

Similar Threads for zeroth component four |
---|

I Riemann tensor components |

I Defining the components of a metric |

I How to fill the stress energy tensor for multi body systems |

A Complex components of stress-energy tensor |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**