Theoretical Mechanics of Particles and Continua by Fetter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on "Theoretical Mechanics of Particles and Continua" by Alexander L. Fetter, highlighting its strengths in teaching introductory graduate-level mechanics with a focus on fluid dynamics and wave phenomena. The book is noted for its concise presentation and useful applied mathematics techniques, making it a valuable resource for students transitioning from undergraduate to graduate studies. However, it lacks extensive coverage of Hamiltonian mechanics, which may not satisfy those seeking in-depth knowledge in that area. Comparisons are made to Goldstein's "Classical Mechanics," which is preferred by some for its comprehensive treatment of Hamiltonian topics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with applied mathematics techniques
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics concepts
  • Exposure to Hamiltonian mechanics (for comparative analysis)
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Goldstein's "Classical Mechanics" for a deeper understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Research applied mathematics techniques relevant to mechanics
  • Study fluid dynamics, particularly wave phenomena in fluids
  • Investigate other graduate-level mechanics texts for comparative insights
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in fluid dynamics and applied mathematics in theoretical mechanics.

For those who have used this book

  • Lightly don't recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Strongly don't recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a pretty good book. I used it to teach myself some intro grad level mechanics and thought that it was concise, has some interesting problems to solve, and has a nice set of chapters on fluids - in particular emphasizing waves in fluids - which was the primary selling point for me. I never did work through the chapter on Hamiltonian mechanics (I know - that is what most people are probably wanting to read first!). The chapters I have read tend to have sections that introduce applied mathematics techniques in a useful way; most techniques I had seen before but still learned something from the discussion. The level is a modest step above Marion and Thornton's classic undergrad book.

I cannot make a useful comparison with other grad mechanics books, since I am not so familiar with them. But if you are looking for a ton of material on Hamiltonian mechanics, this may not be the book for you, since the authors decided to emphasize continuum mechanics instead. For example, Goldstein's book has a ton more on Hamiltonian mechanics and other books likely do too.

I have the old hardback, but I see that it is now a Dover republication and the price makes this book a good deal.

jason
 
I actually bought this by mistake. I took it off the shelf and thought I was buying their Many-body theory book. I returned it after examining the book in the parking lot (before driving back 75 miles: Lucky). After deeper examination from a library copy, I find it I like Goldstein Classical Mechanics slightly better. The old Goldstein (without that chaos stuff was better). My classical mechanics course treated some of the chaos. I feel graduate students would be better served going through the small oscillations chapter or the special relativity chapter or later chapters that we skipped to do chaos.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K