Which book is better in terms of Depth?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on comparing the depth of coverage between two quantum mechanics textbooks: "The Theoretical Minimum: Quantum Mechanics" by Leonard Susskind and "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by Sakurai. Participants explore the appropriateness of each book for different levels of study and the depth of material presented.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that Susskind's book is basic and serves as a good starting point, suggesting that it should be supplemented with more advanced texts like Sakurai.
  • Others propose that Sakurai's book is more advanced and covers more material than Susskind's work.
  • One participant mentions studying specific lecture notes that they believe cover similar content to Sakurai's book, questioning the depth of those notes in comparison.
  • Another participant notes that judging the depth of two manuscripts based solely on initial impressions is challenging, but observes that the second set of lecture notes appears to cover material similarly to Sakurai.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the comparability of the two books, with differing views on their respective depths and suitability for various levels of understanding.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the depth and coverage of the books depend on personal experience and interpretation, and there is no consensus on which book is definitively better in terms of depth.

Physics news on Phys.org
I think you cannot compare these to books. Suskind is at a very basic level and great to start. Of course, you must sublement it by something more advanced like Sakurai.
 
vanhees71 said:
I think you cannot compare these to books. Suskind is at a very basic level and great to start. Of course, you must sublement it by something more advanced like Sakurai.

Now I'm studying - http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qmech/qmech.pdf and then I will study - http://www.pa.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/files/dhoker%20lecture%20notes/quantum_mechanics.pdf , Both of these lecture notes(combined) cover the same content as it is covered in Sakurai"s Modern quantum Mechanics book ?
 
It's of course hard to judge two manuscripts on just glancing over them. On that first glance both look very good. The 2nd one seems to cover the material in a quite similar way as Sakurai.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K