Theoretical value of a simple pendulum in motion

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the motion of a simple pendulum for a physics lab report, specifically finding the relationship between the pendulum's length and its frequency. The user seeks clarification on what constitutes a theoretical value for calculating percent error, with a reference to gravitational acceleration at 9.80 m/s². Suggestions include using the formula T = 2(pi)*sqrt(L/g) to derive a theoretical slope for graphing period versus the square root of length. Additionally, it's recommended to assess measurement errors and compare the experimental slope to the theoretical one for accuracy. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding theoretical values in the context of experimental physics.
S00_SUNNiE
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm new to this forum and I'm not very sure with how I'm suppose to state my problems, thus if it's written wrong please tell me so.

I'm currently doing a motion lab report for my physics class and we have to analyse the motion of a pendulum.
The material used for the lab are: Aparatus, string, 100g bob, and stopwatch (to measure time it takes to complete 30 cycles).
I'm asked to find the relationship between the length and the frequency of the simple pendulum.
i have finhsed mostly everything that's asked for in the lab but for the conclusion I'm asked to add the percent error, but my problem is what is a theoretical value?

Homework Equations


This is the percent Error Formula:
(|theoretical value - experimental value|/theoretical vaule) x 100%

I've asked my teacher what is a theoretical value but she told me to look it up.

The Attempt at a Solution


i've tried googling for the theoretical value and one site has stated that the theoretical value is 9.80m/s2. It too is a lab report about the motion of a simple pendulum but I'm not quite sure if the value is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am thinking that you graphed your data, something like Period vs squareRoot(L), to get a straight line. The accepted formula is T = 2(pi)*squareRoot(L/g) so on that graph theory predicts a slope of 2(pi)/squareRoot(g).
The % error would then be the % difference between your slope and the slope theory predicts.

Personally, I never liked that approach. The scientist usually doesn't know the "correct" value and must estimate the accuracy of measurement. Hey, maybe you can earn a bonus mark! What you do is run your data through a calculator and get the variation or deviation of the data from the line of best fit. (Calculators usually show it when you use the line of best fit feature.) Then you say, "the slope is ___ plus or minus ___".
Then you could say "this is (or isn't) equal to the accepted value to within the experimental error."
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
19K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K