Theories on how the food supply evolved along with life?

  • Thread starter Robert P
  • Start date
  • #1
Robert P
19
1
TL;DR Summary
At all stages of evolution there had to be a suitable food supply
Along with the endless complexities of life and the evolution of life, it occurs to me that at all points there had to be enough available nutrition for existent life forms - and that food supply itself had to go through a process of evolution. It seems self-evident that the environment of early Earth wouldn't have supported dinosaurs or homo sapiens. And of course even today not all life forms are suited for all environments.

What are current theories on how this progressed?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Baluncore
Science Advisor
12,347
6,416
The food chain is not a simple chain, but a braided network. The food supply is also life, so a food source must evolve before it can be consumed.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Astronuc, Robert P and 1 other person
  • #3
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
2022 Award
22,304
6,392
Other than the very earliest stages of abiogenesis and biological evolution, when simple chemicals from the environment were gradually turned into more complex compounds through some ultimately unknown processes, life has always preyed upon other life for food or made 'food' from photosynthesis or chemosynthesis. So the history of the evolution of food is simply the history of the biological evolution of life itself.
 
  • Like
Likes Laroxe, BillTre, Robert P and 1 other person
  • #4
256bits
Gold Member
3,776
1,808
Here is a picture of the Earth's carbon cycle, I suppose present day.
Note the geological underpinnings, besides the biological.

1662466957624.jpeg

You can access
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/ecology/biogeochemical-cycles/a/the-nitrogen-cycle
for some other cycles.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913 and Robert P
  • #5
hutchphd
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2022 Award
5,515
4,700
Yep that's just the way I would design it...wow
 
  • #6
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2022 Award
2,253
7,614
You are correct that ecology startted out simple and then got more complex, like most things biological.

In 2017, Olivia Judson published a paper, not (directly) on how the changes in the food supply over evolutionary time periods, but the changes in the energy sources available for life to use. This is a highly regarded article, it takes a large scale view.
Her sequence of different energy sources is:
  1. geochemical energy: probably used by the "first life forms"
  2. sunlight: available to use after photosynthesis arose.
  3. oxygen: had to wait for cyanobacteria to make oxygen which then provided a large increase in the amount of energy that could be got from food items (as much as 16x the amount of energy obtained from a glucose molecule).
  4. flesh: oxygen highly mobile predators able to eat other (large) organisms.
  5. fire: used only by humans, to cook (pre-digest) food to be able to more easily and more rapidly get more nutrients from certain foods (like meat).

Here is a short Wikipedia article on evolution of ecology.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Astronuc, Robert P and 2 others
  • #7
Laroxe
Science Advisor
508
587
I think I would be careful of the idea of the evolution of food, as Drakkith suggests, life evolves and has indeed become increasingly complex but as most forms of life use the same "chemistry", its not surprising that some lifeforms would evolve to exploit this source of "pre-processed" nutrition. In evolutionary terms, the main selective forces, will be ones that have favoured changes that resisted predation or used some aspects of this predation to facilitate the preys reproduction.

The relationships between different forms of life in an ecosystem can be complex, but nothing has evolved simply to be a food source for other species and understanding the complex networks of interactions is what should form the basis of ecology as a subject of study.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #8
hmmm27
Gold Member
1,081
564
but nothing has evolved simply to be a food source for other species
except the massive variety of plants which count on their seeds being eaten and sown.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and hutchphd
  • #9
hutchphd
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2022 Award
5,515
4,700
This really is a chicken and egg (and corn and wheat and fox and worm and hawk and ...) argument.
 
  • #10
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2022 Award
2,253
7,614
The egg came before eggs.
Reptiles had eggs before there were birds.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #11
pinball1970
Gold Member
1,748
2,407
The egg came before eggs.
Reptiles had eggs before there were birds.
I thought I had someone wandered back into the Chicken egg thread!
 
  • #12
Laroxe
Science Advisor
508
587
except the massive variety of plants which count on their seeds being eaten and sown.
I don't think there is an "except", plants have put a great deal into reaching the point that they are able to reproduce and there is a huge variety of methods that they use. Its only really at the reproductive stage that plants have developed ways of manipulating the behaviour of other species, often with food or the promise of food to increase their own fitness. However this doesn't really imply that this represents the plant evolving to become a food source which in itself would make no sense, what has evolved is a trait to improve fitness.

Plants which are very poisonous or covered with spines may still provide food at specific times to pollinators or specific animals that distribute their seeds and even this can involve highly conditional relationships which may have co-evolved.
 

Suggested for: Theories on how the food supply evolved along with life?

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
587
  • Last Post
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
744
Replies
65
Views
8K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
916
Top