Therefore, (mn)! is divisible by m!(n!)^m.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rukawakaede
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divisibility Factorial
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the divisibility of the factorial expression (mn)! by the product m!(n!)^m. Participants explore the properties of multinomial coefficients and their relationships to binomial coefficients, particularly in the context of integer values for m and n. The conversation includes theoretical reasoning and attempts to generalize specific cases.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that m! (n!)^m divides (mn)! and provides examples to support this belief, seeking further input on the proof.
  • Another participant introduces the multinomial coefficient and suggests that proving its divisibility by m! is sufficient to demonstrate the original claim.
  • A method is proposed involving the factorization of terms and the application of the binomial theorem to show divisibility by 2 for specific cases.
  • Some participants express interest in generalizing the method for composite values of m, questioning the validity of certain identities in those cases.
  • Concerns are raised about proving divisibility for prime powers, with requests for examples to clarify the approach.
  • A later reply discusses the relationship between binomial coefficients and divisibility by their leading factors, suggesting a general principle for divisibility.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proof of the original statement. Multiple competing views and methods are presented, with ongoing questions about generalization and specific cases.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the properties of factorials and multinomial coefficients are not explicitly stated, and the discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps related to generalization for composite m and prime powers.

rukawakaede
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi, we know that for all interger [itex]m[/itex], [itex]n_1!\cdots n_k![/itex] divides [itex]m![/itex] where [itex]n_1+\cdots+n_k=m[/itex].

Now I want to show that [itex]m! (n!)^m[/itex] divides [itex](mn)![/itex].

We see that [itex](n!)^m[/itex] divides [itex](mn)![/itex] since [itex]\overbrace{n+\cdots+n}^{m-terms}=mn[/itex]

Also [itex]m!(nm-m)![/itex] divides [itex](mn)![/itex] similarly.

But how could I show my required statement above? It works for some examples that I've tested and I believe it is true.

Any inputs would be appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi rukawakaede! :smile:

First of all, let us define the multinomial coefficient: (for [itex]k_1+...+k_m=1[/itex])

[tex]\binom{n}{k_1,...,k_m}=\frac{n!}{k_1!...k_m!}[/tex]

What you want to show is that the multinomial coefficient

[tex]\binom{nm}{n,...,n}[/tex]

is divisible by m!

Now, first note the following equality that represents the multinomial coefficients as binomials:

[tex]\binom{nm}{n,...,n}=\binom{n}{n} \binom{2n}{n}\binom{3n}{n} ...\binom{mn}{n}[/tex]

So it actually suffices to show that [itex]\binom{kn}{n}[/itex] is divisible by k.

Let me give the idea on how to prove this by showing that 2 divides [itex]\binom{2n}{n}[/itex].

Factorize [itex]2n=2^rs[/itex] such that 2 does not divide s. In modulo 2, we know that

[tex](X+1)^2=X^2+1[/tex]

and thus

[tex](X+1)^{2^r}=X^{2^r}+1[/tex]

and thus

[tex](X+1)^{2n}=(X^{2^r}+1)^s[/tex]

Expanding both terms using the binomial theorem gives us that the coefficient of [itex]X^n[/itex] in both terms are equal. But the coefficient of [itex]X^n[/itex] in the left polynomial is

[tex]\binom{2n}{n}[/tex]

But the coefficient of [itex]X^n[/itex] in the right polynomial is 0, as we can never write [itex]n=2^rk[/itex] (we have a 2 too much).

Hope that helped.
 
I'm wondering how you would generalize this method to composite m. The identity [itex](1 + x)^{m} \equiv 1 + x^m[/itex] doesn't hold for composite bases.
 
Yuqing said:
I'm wondering how you would generalize this method to composite m. The identity [itex](1 + x)^{m} \equiv 1 + x^m[/itex] doesn't hold for composite bases.

Prove it for all the prime factors. For example, to show that something is divisible by 6 is equivalent to showing that it is divisible by 2 and 3.
 
micromass said:
Prove it for all the prime factors. For example, to show that something is divisible by 6 is equivalent to showing that it is divisible by 2 and 3.

The problem I'm having is with prime powers. For example, your method proves 2 divides [itex]\binom{2n}{n}[/itex]. Can you give an example on how you would prove, say, [itex]\binom{8n}{n}[/itex]?
 
Hmm, I see the problem. But I made it harder than it was. In general, we know that

[tex]\binom{n}{k}=\frac{n}{k}\binom{n-1}{k-1}[/tex]

Thus

[tex]\binom{\alpha n}{n}=\alpha\binom{\alpha n-1}{n-1}[/tex]

so it is divisible by [itex]\alpha[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K