MHB Therefore, the volume of the rectangular prism is 84 units cubed.

682357
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What is the answer to this question. The surface area of a rectangular prism is 136 square units. Some edge measurements are 6 and 2.What is the volume?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Math homework

682357 said:
What is the answer to this question. The surface area of a rectangular prism is 136 square units. Some edge measurements are 6 and 2.What is the volume?
We are not here to do your homework. We can, however, guide you through.

So what have you been able to do with this problem so far?

-Dan
 
Re: Math homework

I got the answer 84units3 (or cubed)
 
Re: Math homework

682357 said:
What is the answer to this question. The surface area of a rectangular prism is 136 square units. Some edge measurements are 6 and 2.What is the volume?

682357 said:
I got the answer 84units3 (or cubed)

The dimensions are length $\ell$, width $w$ and height $h$. Suppose we know $\ell$ and $w$ to be 6 and 2 respectively. A rectangular prism (cuboid) has 3 pairs of matching faces, and it surface area $A$ is given by:

$$A=2(\ell w+\ell h+wh)$$

Using the given surface area and $\ell$ and $w$, we may state:

$$136=2(6\cdot2+6h+2h)$$

$$68=12+8h$$

$$h=7$$

And so the volume $V$ (in units cubed) is given by:

$$V=\ell wh=6\cdot2\cdot7=84\quad\checkmark$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top