Therefore, this is not possible and the correct answer is no.

  • Thread starter Thread starter alingy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Operations
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Can I get this matrix
\begin{smallmatrix}
1&1&0\\ 0&0&1\\ 0&0&0
\end{smallmatrix}
from the identidy matrix I3 like this:


\begin{smallmatrix}
1&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ 0&0&1
\end{smallmatrix}
Add second row to first row.
Then substract second row from itself.
Is the substraction of a row from itself allowed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alingy1 said:
Can I get this matrix
\begin{smallmatrix}
1&1&0\\ 0&0&1\\ 0&0&0
\end{smallmatrix}
from the identidy matrix I3 like this:\begin{smallmatrix}
1&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ 0&0&1
\end{smallmatrix}
Add second row to first row.
Then substract second row from itself.
Is the substraction of a row from itself allowed?

No, you can only add or subtract linear combinations of other rows that are not the row itself when performing row operations.
 
In fact, it is NOT possible to get
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}1& 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
from the identity matrix by "row operations".

If it were then by doing the "reverse" row operations to the identity matrix would give the inverse matrix. And this matrix, since it has one row of all 0s, has determinant 0 and is NOT invertible.

(Every row operation has a reverse- the reverse of "multiply row i by a non-zero number" is "divide row i by the number, the reverse of "swap two rows" is itself, and the reverse of "add x (x non zero) times row j to row i" is "subtract 1/x times row j from row i.)
 
Last edited by a moderator: