Thermal Energy dissapated from brakes.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the thermal energy dissipated from the brakes of a car descending a hill. The problem involves a 1600 kg car that slows down from 95 km/h to 30 km/h over a distance of 0.27 km on a 20-degree incline.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the conservation of energy principle but encounters difficulties with the equation setup. Some participants suggest focusing on the changes in kinetic and potential energy to assess energy loss.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided guidance on the correct approach, emphasizing the importance of unit conversion and distinguishing between different quantities in the equation. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the problem without reaching a definitive solution.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted constraint regarding the conversion of speed from km/h to m/s, which has been identified as a source of confusion. Additionally, the change in height of the car is mentioned as a critical factor that needs to be accurately determined.

besenji
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is another one that I have given several attempts.

Calculate the thermal energy dissipated from brakes in a 1600 kg car that descends a 20 degree hill. The car begins braking when its speed is 95 km/h and slows to a speed of 30 km/h in a distance of 0.27 km measured along the road.

I tried using the conservation of energy equation.

1/2mv^2+mgh=1/2mv^2+mgh+Eloss

This doesn't seem to give me what I'm looking for.

Any help is greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the correct method.
Think of it terms of speed and kinetic energy change.
change in ke + change in pe = energy loss.
 
Just remember to use m/s instead of km/h, and make sure you get the right value for the change in height of the car.

In your equation, the v and h on the rhs should be different from those on the lhs. Don't use the same symbol for different quantities!
 
Thank you soooo, much. The problem was just that I had the velocity in the wrong units.
I would have spent forever on that problem!
 
Excellent!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K