Thermal physics, COP upper bound for heat driven heat pumps

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving the upper bounds of the coefficient of performance (COP) for heat-driven heat pumps, work-driven heat pumps, and heat engines with multiple thermal reservoirs. The author presents a mathematical framework assuming isothermal heat exchanges, leading to theoretical upper bounds for efficiencies and COPs. Key insights include the importance of distinguishing between absolute and actual heat values in different cycles and providing clearer derivations for efficiency and COP formulas. The author seeks feedback on potential mathematical errors in their presentation and suggestions for improving its clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics, particularly the laws governing heat engines and heat pumps.
  • Familiarity with the concept of coefficient of performance (COP) in thermal systems.
  • Knowledge of isothermal processes and their implications in thermodynamic cycles.
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating inequalities and formulas in thermodynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the efficiency formula for heat engines and heat pumps.
  • Study the implications of isothermal heat exchanges in thermodynamic cycles.
  • Learn about the mathematical inequalities governing heat transfer in thermal systems.
  • Explore methods for presenting complex thermodynamic concepts clearly and succinctly.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics educators, thermodynamics students, and engineers involved in designing or analyzing heat pumps and heat engines, particularly those seeking to enhance their understanding of COP and efficiency metrics.

sf1001
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I made a presentation where I derived, or at least attempted to derive, the formulae for the upper bounds of the efficiency/cop for a heat engine, work driven heat pump, and a heat driven heat pump with 3 thermal reservoirs, hot, warm, and cold. Could someone check my math?
I made a presentation where I derived, or at least attempted to derive, the formulae for the upper bounds of the efficiency/cop (cop = coefficient of performance) for a heat engine, work driven heat pump, and a heat driven heat pump with 3 thermal reservoirs, hot, warm, and cold. There are many online sources to compare my result for the efficiency/cop of a heat engine or work driven heat pump with 2 heat reservoirs, hot and cold, but I haven't found any for the last case, the heat driven heat pump. I am assuming all isothermal heat exchanges with the heat reservoirs, which I think yields a theoretical upper bound for the calculated efficiencies and cop. I intend to use this presentation for tutoring HS physics. Are there any mathematical errors in the linked presentation, particularly for my formulae for the cop of the heat driven heat pump? Also, is there a way I could make the presentation more succinct? Here is a link to the presentation:

https://docs.google.com/presentatio...ouid=113815052145113661511&rtpof=true&sd=true
 
Science news on Phys.org
Just a few comments.

1. It can get confusing if you use absolute values for heats when switching between the forward cycle (heat engines) and the reverse cycle (heat pumps and refrigerator). As as long as you make it clear that ##\frac{Q_c}{Q_h}>\frac{T_c}{T_h}## for the forward cycle and ##\frac{Q_c}{Q_h}<\frac{T_c}{T_h}## or ##\frac{Q_h}{Q_c}>\frac{T_h}{T_c}## for the reverse cycle, this is ok.*

*This follows from ##\Delta S=Q_h/T_h+Q_c/T_c>0## (where terms are actual, not absolute values). So when heat flow to the hot reservoir is negative (heat engine) the inequality is met only if ##\frac{|Q_c|}{T_c}>\frac{|Q_h|}{T_h}## and when heat flow to the cold reservoir is negative (heat pumps and refrigerators), the inquality is met only if ##\frac{|Q_c|}{T_c}<\frac{|Q_h|}{T_h}##

2. In frame 4, an easier to follow derivation might be:
\eta = \frac{W}{Q_h}=\frac{Q_h-Q_c}{Q_h}=(1-\frac{Q_c}{Q_h})
and, since: ##\frac{Q_c}{Q_h}>\frac{T_c}{T_h}## for a heat engine (from 1. above) this means:
\eta = (1-\frac{Q_c}{Q_h})&lt;(1-\frac{T_c}{T_h})
3. Similarly in frame 6, it might be easier to show:
COP_h = \frac{Q_h}{W}=\frac{Q_h}{Q_h-Q_c}=\frac{1}{(1-\frac{Q_c}{Q_h})}
and, since: ##\frac{Q_c}{Q_h}<\frac{T_c}{T_h}## for a heat pump (from 1. above) this means:
COP_h=\frac{1}{(1-\frac{Q_c}{Q_h})}&lt;\frac{1}{(1-\frac{T_c}{T_h})}
4. And again for frame 7 the cooling coefficient of performance:
COP_c = \frac{Q_c}{W}=\frac{Q_c}{Q_h-Q_c}=\frac{1}{(\frac{Q_h}{Q_c}-1)}
and, since: ##\frac{Q_h}{Q_c}>\frac{T_h}{T_c}## for a refrigerator (from 1. above) this means:
COP_c=\frac{1}{(\frac{Q_h}{Q_c}-1)}&lt;\frac{1}{(\frac{T_h}{T_c}-1)}
5. You might also want to explain why a heat driven heat pump makes any sense. Why not just have heat flow directly from hot to warm?

AM
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
22K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
12K