Thermal Physics Kittel chapter 6 -- Entropy of mixing problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluepilotg-2_07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy Thermal
bluepilotg-2_07
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Suppose that a system of N atoms of type A is placed
in diffusive contact with a system of N atoms of type B at the same temperature
and volume. Show that after diffusive equilibrium is reached the total entropy
is increased by 2N log 2. The entropy increase 2N log 2 is known as the entropy
of mixing. If the atoms are identical (A = B), show that there is no increase in
entropy when diffusive contact is established. The difference in the results has
been called the Gibbs paradox.
Relevant Equations
sigma = log(g), mu = tau*log(N/V*n_Q), sigma = N[log(V*n_Q/N)+5/2]
I've been working on this problem for the past 3 days. I have other papers with different ways of tackling the problem. However, I just cannot get to the answer (change in entropy = 2Nlog(2)).
unnamed.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Your attached picture of your work is very light and hard to read. Can you upload a better image please?

Also, I will send you a message with tips for posting math equations at PF using LaTeX. That is a much better way to show your work in the future here. :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top