Thermal Physics Problem -- Dropping a hot mass of iron into 20C water

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a thermal physics problem involving the transfer of heat between a hot mass of iron and water at 20°C. The final equilibrium temperature, T, is calculated to be 26°C using the equation for thermal energy conservation: 0.200 x 450 x (300 - T) = 1.0 x 4200 x (T - 20). The confusion arises from the use of (300 - T) to represent the temperature change of the iron, which is clarified through the concept of thermal equilibrium. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the heat capacity and its relation to the final temperature in calorimetry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal energy transfer principles
  • Familiarity with specific heat capacity concepts
  • Knowledge of thermal equilibrium
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of thermal equilibrium in detail
  • Learn about specific heat capacity and its applications in calorimetry
  • Explore the derivation and application of the heat capacity formula
  • Investigate the principles of heat transfer in multi-object systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics, as well as anyone involved in experiments related to heat transfer and calorimetry.

Woopa
Messages
20
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
A piece of iron of mass 200g and temperature 300 degrees celcius is dropped into 1.00kg of water of temperature 20 degrees celcius.

Predict the final equilibrium of the water.

(Take c for iron as 540 J/kg/K and for water as 4200 J/kg/K).
Relevant Equations
Q=mcΔT)
Hi,

The solution for this question is

thermal energy lost= thermal energy gained
0.200x450x(300-T)=1.0x4200x(T-20)
T=26 degrees celsius.

However, I am struggling to grasp why (300-T) is used.

I have always known a change in something to be final - initial. Therefore change in T= Final- initial.

However, in the case of (300-T) Initial- Final is being used for the change and I am struggling to understand why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The temperature of the piece of iron has been reduced from the initial 300 to the final common value of T, which is shared by iron and water once the heat transfer has ended.
Please, note a typo error (540 versus 450).
You can read more about thermal equilibrium here:
https://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/thermalP/u18l1d.cfm
 
Last edited:
The solution is poorly presented and that is why you are struggling to understand it. The starting equation is
##m_1 c_1 \Delta T_1 + m_2 c_2\Delta T_2=0##.
If you replace the Deltas with actual differences, you get
##m_1 c_1 (T-T_1) + m_2 c_2(T-T_2)=0##.
Now move one of the terms to the other side of the equation and change sign
##m_1 c_1 (T-T_1) = - m_2 c_2(T-T_2) =+ m_2 c_2(T_2-T).##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Woopa
kuruman said:
The solution is poorly presented and that is why you are struggling to understand it. The starting equation is
##m_1 c_1 \Delta T_1 + m_2 c_2\Delta T_2=0##.
If you replace the Deltas with actual differences, you get
##m_1 c_1 (T-T_1) + m_2 c_2(T-T_2)=0##.
Now move one of the terms to the other side of the equation and change sign
##m_1 c_1 (T-T_1) = - m_2 c_2(T-T_2) =+ m_2 c_2(T_2-T).##
Excellent I've got it! Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman and Lnewqban
Woopa said:
Excellent I've got it! Thank you!
You are welcome. BTW if you use the heat capacity ##C## instead of the product of mass and specific heat heat, the answer takes a familiar form $$T=\frac{C_1T_1+C_2T_2}{C_1+C_2}$$ which is just like the expression for the center of mass of two masses. The final equilibrium temperature is the heat-capacity-averaged temperature much like the center of mass is the mass-averaged position. With this in mind, you can have ##N## objects at different initial temperatures thrown together in a calorimeter and be able to write down the final temperature immediately:$$T_{\text{final}}=\frac{m_1c_1T_1+m_2c_2T_2+\dots+m_Nc_NT_N}{m_1c_1+m_2c_2+\dots+m_Nc_N}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K