Thermo - Simple Energy balance equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the General Energy balance equation in thermodynamics, specifically focusing on its application in both closed and open systems. Participants explore different formulations of energy equations, the significance of various energy terms, and the conditions under which specific equations should be applied.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the General Energy balance equation and questions the use of different formulations for ΔE, indicating uncertainty about which to apply in various scenarios.
  • Another participant argues against the inclusion of the Egen term in the energy equation, suggesting it misrepresents energy conservation and emphasizes the importance of understanding energy transformations instead.
  • A participant acknowledges confusion due to not accounting for the work done by the fluid and recognizes that both presented equations are valid but context-dependent.
  • There is a clarification regarding the distinction between flow work (pv) and boundary work (∫p(dv)), with participants discussing their relevance in different contexts.
  • A later reply outlines the application of the first law of thermodynamics for closed and open systems, introducing additional equations and terms relevant to each case.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the inclusion of the Egen term and the interpretation of energy equations. While some agree on the importance of understanding energy transformations, there is no consensus on the best approach to apply the energy balance equations in various scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need to consider specific conditions and assumptions when applying energy equations, such as the flow of mass and the relevance of different energy forms in particular situations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals in thermodynamics, particularly those grappling with energy balance equations in both closed and open systems.

ksukhin
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
The General Energy balance equation is:
∑ENin - ∑ENout + Egen = Est (in rate form - don't know how to put the dot above)

I know that Est is 0 when the system operates at Steady State Steady Flow (SSSF).

I have 2 formulas for ΔE in "Q-W = ΔE"
1) ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE
2) ΔE = m[h2 - h1 +(V2-V1)2/2 + g(z2-z1)]
How do I know which one to use in which scenario?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  1. ksukhin said:
    ∑ENin - ∑ENout + Egen = Est
    Dude! There wouldn't be any ## E_(gen) ## term in the energy equation. Energy cannot be created neither can it be destroyed. Though many textbooks write this term but this is not a good habit to follow. It destroys the whole beauty of energy conservation equation. What you interpret as ## E_(gen) ## is actually the energy transformation from one form to other across the system boundary. For example suppose you have an electric heater of 1000 Watt. Instead of interpreting as 1000 J of energy being produced per second, you can interpret it as 1000 Joule of electric energy (from out of the system) coming inside the system and getting converted into heat energy, per second.
  2. For your concern of which equation to use, I will suggest you to stop plugging equations in problems. Rather sit back and think about all the energy interactions going on for 1-2 minutes before actually starting the solution. The only reason, you see so many energy equations is because there are situations when one form of energy is negligible in comparison to others and hence are neglected. For example is the ( ## v^2 ## ) term is very small as compared to the enthalpy terms ( ## h ## ), you can neglect the kinetic energy. You will know this once you choose your system and analyse it. Once you have identified, all the energies being involved, go for the energy conservation law. All you need to remember is that you cannot create energy out of nothing and that you cannot destroy it either.
    So the equation I prefer is $$ ∑E_(in) = ΣE_(out) + Δe $$ where ## E_(in) ## involves all the energy coming inside the system in form of external work, heat input, enthalpy, kinetic energy of incoming fluid etc and similarly ## E_(out) ## will include every outgoing energy. Further ## Δe = e_(final)-e_(initial) ## where ## e ## includes every energy associated with the substance inside the boundary. If you wish to write this in terms of rates, simply differentiate. The differentiation will be rather easy for a specific problem. I mean suppose I consider the enthalpy term, ## H = m* h## , where ## h ## is the specific enthalpy, so in rate form this will simply be mass flow rate multiplied by specific enthalpy.
See in nutshell, all you need to do is know the energy transformations and trust the energy conservation law. Trust me, once you know how to use the energy conservation law properly, these equations will never bother you. You will get used to write your own equation for every case.

I have tried my best to be clear at what I am trying to convey, if there is something I have missed or something I am not clear at, please let me know.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ksukhin
Thanks for the quick reply!
I was a bit in shock since I have 8 finals in a span of 6 days so I blanked for a minute. I realized what I was doing wrong why i didn't get the equation.

I wasn't accounting for the work done by the fluid ##pv## and since ##h=u+pv## both equations are valid but they're case specific.

I was jumping from an Otto cycle which had QH=u2-u1 and a power plant where they use enthalphy. I just couldn't see that there was a ##pv## term not included because it wasn't needed.

Thanks again. I"m just a bit all over the place cause I'm freaking out
 
Calm down buddy. I have been through same. However just for sake of completion (I think you already know this), ## pv ## is not same as the work ## ∫p(dv) ## .
  • ## pv ## is the flow work and you are correct it comes into picture only when there is flow. Its mainly because of the change in pressure and volume of the fluid at the inlet and exit of a control volume (or any system in general)
  • ## ∫p(dv) ## isthe boundary work associated with the change in volume of the system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ksukhin
Vatsal Sanjay said:
Calm down buddy. I have been through same. However just for sake of completion (I think you already know this), ## pv ## is not same as the work ## ∫p(dv) ## .
  • ## pv ## is the flow work and you are correct it comes into picture only when there is flow. Its mainly because of the change in pressure and volume of the fluid at the inlet and exit of a control volume (or any system in general)
  • ## ∫p(dv) ## isthe boundary work associated with the change in volume of the system.

Yup I see the difference now, thanks again! I'll do my best not to panic tomorrow haha
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vatsal Sanjay
In post #1,

The equations Q-W = ΔE and ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE comprise the version of the first law that apply to a closed system (no mass entering or leaving)

The equations ΔE =-m[h2 - h1 +(V2-V1)2/2 + g(z2-z1)]+Q-Ws and ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE comprise the version of the first law that apply to an open system (where mass can be entering and leaving). In this equation, Ws is the shaft work.

Chet
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
54K