Thermodynamics: Defining Pressure

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter matsciguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and understanding of pressure in thermodynamics, particularly in relation to temperature and entropy. Participants explore the implications of these relationships in both equilibrium and non-equilibrium systems, as well as the mathematical derivations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the relation P=T (∂S/∂V)U,N and questions how temperature is involved in the definition of pressure.
  • Another participant clarifies that pressure is well-defined only for systems in equilibrium, as non-equilibrium systems exhibit varying pressures throughout.
  • A participant elaborates on the behavior of fluids as collections of subsystems, suggesting that in the continuous limit, pressure varies continuously.
  • One participant discusses the challenge of extending the intuition of energy flow and entropy to pressure, particularly with the inclusion of temperature.
  • Another participant proposes an alternative definition of pressure as the change in energy of the system with respect to volume.
  • A later reply references the first law of thermodynamics to explain the relationship between temperature, entropy, and pressure, emphasizing the conditions under which these relationships hold.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that pressure is defined in the context of equilibrium systems, but there is no consensus on how to extend these definitions to non-equilibrium situations or the implications of including temperature in the pressure relation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the dependence on specific conditions such as constant energy and number of particles, as well as the unresolved complexities of non-equilibrium thermodynamics.

matsciguy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand the relation:

P=T (∂S/∂V)U,N.

I understand the definition of temperature as:

1/T =(∂S/∂U)V,N.

The relation for pressure has a similar derivation, but how can T be thrown in there? In my textbook, the author derives the relation for two systems in thermal equilibrium. Are we supposed to only compare the pressures of systems in thermal equilibrium? I'm clearly a little confused -- any help would be appreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Pressure as a single value is only well defined for a system in equilibrium, because if the system were not in equilibrium then the pressure would generally vary throughout the system. So unless you are studying non-equilibrium thermodynamics you will only compare pressures of systems in equilibrium
 
matsciguy said:
I'm trying to understand the relation:

P=T (∂S/∂V)U,N.

I understand the definition of temperature as:

1/T =(∂S/∂U)V,N.

The relation for pressure has a similar derivation, but how can T be thrown in there? In my textbook, the author derives the relation for two systems in thermal equilibrium. Are we supposed to only compare the pressures of systems in thermal equilibrium? I'm clearly a little confused -- any help would be appreciated.

As far as fluids and other such things, you consider them as a collection of many subsystems, each of which have a well defined pressure. in the continuous limit, you get a continuous variation of pressure.

As was said before, to consider the behavior of such systems in time, we need to look at non equilibrium thermodynamics, namely kinetics and transport theory in general. That will teach you about diffusion and the forces that drive the system as a whole toward equilibrium. You may want to look into the Boltzmann transport equation in particular.
 
Thank you.

Perhaps I'm thinking about this wrong. But:

Say we have two systems that can exchange energy only. Their respective volumes are held constant, as well as number of particles, and total energy between them.

The definition of temperature gives us a basis for seeing which way energy will flow in this system, knowing entropy of the total system to increase. Compare the derivatives for different distributions of energy.

I'm having a hard time extending this intuition to pressure, given the extra T. (Or likewise, chemical potential.) I'm not sure what systems could have constant energy and number of particles and exchange volume only. Nonetheless, the situation seems akin to multiplying (∂S/∂V)U,N by P, in which case I'm not sure about its comparative value.
 
Alternatively you can define pressure as the change in energy of the system with respect to volume.
 
matsciguy said:
I'm trying to understand the relation:

P=T (∂S/∂V)U,N.

I understand the definition of temperature as:

1/T =(∂S/∂U)V,N.

The relation for pressure has a similar derivation, but how can T be thrown in there? In my textbook, the author derives the relation for two systems in thermal equilibrium. Are we supposed to only compare the pressures of systems in thermal equilibrium? I'm clearly a little confused -- any help would be appreciated.
It follows from the first law, which leads to the fundamental equation of thermodynamics: TdS = dU + PdV

If you start with TdS = dU + PdV, and keep U and N constant (dU = 0), then:

[tex]T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_{U, N} = P\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial V}\right)_{U, N} = P[/tex]

This means that pressure is the rate of heat flow with respect to change in volume in a reversible process where U and N are held constant. For an ideal gas, of course, holding U constant means T is constant. So this is simply saying that the work done in a quasi-static isothermal process is equal to the heat flow.

AM
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K