Thermodynamics filling steam tables for water

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on filling steam tables for water, specifically addressing discrepancies in enthalpy values. The user calculated the enthalpy (h) for a saturated liquid at a given temperature and pressure, arriving at a value of 335.02 kJ/kg, while the solution manual states it as 335.3 kJ/kg. The user is seeking clarification on the difference in values, which is attributed to the treatment of the compressed liquid as a saturated liquid due to the low pressure compared to the table's lowest value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of steam tables and their application in thermodynamics.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of saturated and compressed liquids.
  • Basic knowledge of enthalpy calculations in thermodynamic systems.
  • Proficiency in interpreting pressure and temperature relationships in steam tables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between saturated and compressed liquid properties in steam tables.
  • Learn how to accurately interpolate values in steam tables for various pressures and temperatures.
  • Study the principles of thermodynamic cycles involving water and steam.
  • Explore advanced topics in thermodynamics, such as the use of software tools for steam table calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, thermodynamics researchers, and anyone involved in energy systems or heat transfer applications.

pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4
Hey guys I attached the problem and the solution. I only have a question on row 4. The bolded #s are the one's we were supposed to find, but this is from the solution manual.

To find h, since the given pressure is much lower than the lowest pressure value in the compressed liquid table we are justified to treat the compressed liquid as saturated liquid at the given temperature. I used the table and got h=335.02, but the manual has it as 335.3.

I don't see how they got their number? Am I correct?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    10.1 KB · Views: 537
Physics news on Phys.org
you are roughly correct yes
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K