Thermodynamics, finding the fundamental equation of ideal gases

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the fundamental equation for a monoatomic ideal gas, utilizing the equations of state PV=NRT and U=(3NRT)/2. Participants explore the relationship between entropy and the variables involved, particularly focusing on the integration of Gibbs-Duhem's relation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the integration of Gibbs-Duhem's relation and the definitions of variables such as u and v. Questions arise regarding the integration constants and the correct interpretation of initial values for variables.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on correcting the integration constants and clarifying variable definitions. There is an ongoing exploration of how to properly incorporate initial values into the equations, with some participants reaching a clearer understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the treatment of variables versus constants, particularly in the context of initial values for N, U, and their respective molar quantities. This has led to differing interpretations of the results derived from the equations.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,932
Reaction score
283

Homework Statement


An ideal monoatomic gas is characterized by the two equations PV=NRT and U=\frac{3NRT}{2} in which R is a constant.
Find the fundamental equation corresponding to a monoatomic ideal gas.

Homework Equations


S=\left ( \frac{1}{T} \right ) U+\left ( \frac{P}{T} \right ) V- \left ( \frac{\mu }{T} \right ) N.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm given 2 equations of state, one is missing in order to get the fundamental equation. In the entropy representation the variables of the fundamental equation are \frac{1}{T}, \frac{P}{T} and \frac{\mu }{T}.
The missing one is \frac{\mu }{T} (U,V,N)=\frac{\mu}{T} (u,v) where u and v in lower script are the molar energy and volume respectively.
So I have that \frac{1}{T}=\frac{3R}{2u} and \frac{P}{T}=\frac{R}{v}.
I use Gibbs-Duhem's relation d \left ( \frac{\mu }{T} \right ) =ud \left ( \frac{1 }{T} \right ) +v d \left ( \frac{P }{T} \right ). Replacing the variables in parenthesis and integrating both sides, I reach (like the book): \frac{\mu}{T}=-\frac{3}{2}R \ln \left ( \frac{u}{u_0} \right ) -R \ln \left ( \frac{v}{v_0} \right ) +\left ( \frac{\mu }{\mu _0} \right ) _0.
When I replace this equation into the expression for S given above and using the fact that u=N/U, u_0=\frac{N}{U_0}, I reach that S =\frac{3U^2 R}{2N}+\frac{RV^2}{N}+ N \left [ \frac{3R}{2} \ln \left ( \frac{U_0}{U} \right ) +R\ln \left ( \frac{V_0}{V} \right ) - \left ( \frac{\mu }{T} \right ) _0 \right ]. Using some log property this simplifies to S=\frac{3U^2R}{2N} +\frac{RV^2}{N} +NR \ln \left [ \left ( \frac{U_0}{U} \right ) ^{3/2} \left ( \frac{V_0}{V} \right ) \right ] -N \left ( \frac{\mu }{\mu _0} \right ) _0.
However this differs from the answer given in the book: S= \frac {5NR}{2}-N \left ( \frac {\mu }{T} \right ) _0 +NR \ln \left [ \left ( \frac {U}{U_0} \right ) ^{3/2} \left ( \frac{V}{V_0} \right ) \left ( \frac {N}{N_0} \right ) ^{-5/2} \right ].
I do not see, for the life of me, what I've done wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi fluidistic.

Let's start with your integration constant.
It should be ##(\frac{\mu}{T})_0## instead of ##(\frac{\mu}{\mu_0})_0##.

Then you write u=N/U, but that is not right.
Since you defined u to be the molar volume, u=U/N.

Perhaps you can redo it?
 
Thanks a lot for helping me!
You are absolutely right, I've redone everything with more care. I reach however S=\frac{5RN}{2}-N \left ( \frac{\mu}{T} \right ) _0+NR \ln \left [ \left ( \frac{U}{U_0} \right ) ^{3/2} \left ( \frac{V}{V_0} \right ) \right ].
Therefore it seems like I'm missing a term in the logarithm.
It seems it comes from the integration of the Gibbs-Duhem relation: d \left ( \frac{\mu }{T} \right ) =ud \left ( \frac{1 }{T} \right ) +v d \left ( \frac{P }{T} \right ). It seems that when I integrate I should get an extra term like "-R \ln \left ( \frac{N}{N_0} \right ). I don't really know how to get that.
 
Maybe it's simpler than you think.
What did you fill in for ##u_0##?
 
Last edited:
I like Serena said:
Maybe it's simpler than you think.
What did you fill in for ##u_0##?
Hmm I still don't see it. I took u_0=\frac{U_0}{N}.
 
fluidistic said:
Hmm I still don't see it. I took u_0=\frac{U_0}{N}.

Note that N is also a variable that changes.
It has an initial value too, just like ##u_0## and ##U_0##.
 
I like Serena said:
Note that N is also a variable that changes.
It has an initial value too, just like ##u_0## and ##U_0##.

Yes I know this but when should I make use of this?
Here are my steps:
1)\frac{1}{T}=\frac{3NR}{2U}=\frac{3R}{2u}
2)\frac{P}{T}=\frac{NR}{V}=\frac{R}{v}
I use Gibbs-Duhem's relation d \left ( \frac{\mu }{T} \right ) =ud \left ( \frac{1 }{T} \right ) +v d \left ( \frac{P }{T} \right ).
3)ud \left ( \frac{1 }{T} \right ) =-\frac{3Rdu}{2u}
4)v d \left ( \frac{P }{T} \right ) =-R\frac{dv}{v}.
Integrating the GD relations gives me \frac{\mu}{T}=-\frac{3}{2}R \ln \left ( \frac{u}{u_0} \right ) -R \ln \left ( \frac{v}{v_0} \right ) +\left ( \frac{\mu }{T} \right ) _0. The book (Callen's page 52) reaches exactly the same result so far.
He then says that inserting this into the Euler equation S=\left ( \frac{1}{T} \right ) U+\left ( \frac{P}{T} \right ) V- \left ( \frac{\mu }{T} \right ) N one reaches S= \frac {5NR}{2}-N \left ( \frac {\mu }{T} \right ) _0 +NR \ln \left [ \left ( \frac {U}{U_0} \right ) ^{3/2} \left ( \frac{V}{V_0} \right ) \left ( \frac {N}{N_0} \right ) ^{-5/2} \right ].
So my error is when I insert what I obtained into the Euler equation or it's in integrating GD relation (in which case the book would also be wrong) or it's in either of the 4 steps I denoted by 1), etc.?
I really don't see it. :/
 
I got to your book result substituting ##u_0=\frac{U_0}{N_0}## and ##v_0=\frac{V_0}{N_0}## in the integrated GD result.
 
I like Serena said:
I got to your book result substituting ##u_0=\frac{U_0}{N_0}## and ##v_0=\frac{V_0}{N_0}## in the integrated GD result.

Ah! That explains everything :biggrin: In my case those were variables, I didn't even notice. Now I reach the desired result... thank you very much for all.
 
  • #10
Just out of curiosity, were my previous hints too cryptic?
It is not my intention to make a thread a cryptic puzzle...
Perhaps you have an idea what kind of hint I might have given that would have helped you better?
 
  • #11
I like Serena said:
Just out of curiosity, were my previous hints too cryptic?
It is not my intention to make a thread a cryptic puzzle...
Perhaps you have an idea what kind of hint I might have given that would have helped you better?

You mean post 6? No, not cryptic. In fact now I understand your "hint" that I should have used N_0 instead of N. I did not realize that with my definition of u_0, it wasn't even a constant.
So in my case pointing out in post 6 that my definition of u_0 was wrong and that it's not even a constant would have made me understand where the problem lies. I did not realize it, because I already knew that N was a variable and I thought that was what you wanted me to know.
But I'm maybe a "weird learner" :) Anyway, thank you very much for having went through all of this with me.
 
  • #12
Okay. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K