Thermodynamics Problem and Fourier's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrbranches
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Thermodynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the heat required to raise the temperature of a 1-ton copper structure to 200°C within 20 minutes, considering heat loss due to thermal transfer. Key concepts include Fourier's Law for heat conduction and the distinction between semi-infinite solid and thin wire structures. The thermal conductivity of copper is noted as 385 W/m K, and the heat flux behavior varies significantly between these two scenarios. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding transient heat conduction and the factors affecting heat transfer coefficients based on the heating method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Fourier's Law of heat conduction
  • Thermal conductivity of materials, specifically copper
  • Concepts of transient heat conduction
  • Heat transfer coefficients and their dependence on heating methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Study transient heat conduction principles in detail
  • Explore empirical formulas for heat transfer coefficients in various heating methods
  • Learn about the differences in heat transfer behavior between semi-infinite solids and thin wire structures
  • Investigate practical applications of heat exchangers and their design considerations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and students involved in thermal analysis, heat transfer, and materials science will benefit from this discussion.

mrbranches
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following hypothetical problem:

I have a structure consisting of approximately 1 ton of copper. I need to calculate the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of an area of the structure to 200C within a timeframe of 20 mins. This requires taking into consideration heat lost to thermal transfer. I understand that copper has a thermal conductivity of 385 W/m K and that the first step will be to calculate the flux rate by applying Fourier's Law. However, I'm at a loss where to go from here.

If anyone can hep me with this problem I'd greatly appreciate it. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to give more information on you problem, like a drawing and some idea about the context. For example, this would allow us to see if your problem is closer to a semi-infinite solid problem or to a thin wire structure problem. Look in a book or on the web about "transient heat conduction".

In the case of a semi-infinite heat conduction problem, the heat flux will decrease with time as k DT/(a.t)^0.5, this is so because the heat flux will penetrate into the solid and the temperature gradient at the surface will decrease with time. The conductivity is k, DT is the temperature difference between the heating medium and the bulk solid, a is the heat diffusivity, t is the time. After some time, the main heat transfer resistance is within the solid itself because of the reduced tempertaure gradients: the overall heat transfer coefficient is determined by the state of the heat transfer within the solid.

In contrast, for a thin wire structure, the internal temperature (within the wire) will essentially be uniform and the heat flux will decrease faster, exponentially. The heat conductivity and the diffusivity will play little role (as long as the structure is thin enough) and the heat exchange will be determined by the external heat exchange coefficient. This will depend on the method of heating: radiant, contact, convective, and the empirical formulas to be used are the main topic of heat transfer handbooks. For example, for convective heat with gas, the heat transfer coefficient depends on the speed of the gas along the solid surface.

Michel

PS: Are you maybe dealing with some kind of heat exchanger?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K