Thermodynamics problem -- Pressure oscillations in a jar

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 1K views
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
I add a Figure with the problem and solution. I have difficulty with a solution to the given problem. Why ##F=-kx=Adp##, I do not understand minus sign because we are working with scalars not vectors. It is correct to say that
##\vec{F}=-kx\vec{i}##, but is not correct to say that ##F=-kx##. Can you explain to me this part?
 

Attachments

  • problem.png
    problem.png
    33.1 KB · Views: 195
Physics news on Phys.org
LagrangeEuler said:
It is correct to say that ##\vec{F}=-kx\vec{i}##, but is not correct to say that ##F=-kx##. Can you explain to me this part?
I would prefer ##\ \vec F = - k\vec x\ ##. The minus sign indicates that the directions are opposite. For motion along a straight line one can dispose of the vector character, but the minus sign stays:$$
\vec F = - k\vec x \Leftrightarrow F \hat \imath = - k x\hat \imath\quad \Rightarrow \quad F = - k x $$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LagrangeEuler
Is it correct to write
[tex](p_0+\frac{mg}{A})V_0^{\gamma}=p_2(V_0-Ax)^{\gamma}[/tex]?
From that
[tex]p_2=\frac{(p_0+\frac{mg}{A})V_0^{\gamma}}{(V_0-Ax)^{\gamma}}[/tex]
and
[tex]p_2=\frac{p_0+\frac{mg}{A}}{(1-\frac{Ax}{V_0})^{\gamma}}[/tex]
Can we assume here that ##x## is very small so that
[tex](1+x)^n \approx 1+nx[/tex]?
From that
[tex]p_2=\frac{p_0+\frac{mg}{A}}{1-\frac{\gamma A x}{V_0}}[/tex]
 
LagrangeEuler said:
Is it correct to write
[tex](p_0+\frac{mg}{A})V_0^{\gamma}=p_2(V_0-Ax)^{\gamma}\ \ ?[/tex]
Your book says ##\ x = dV/A\ ## so it chooses a coordinate system with upwards as positive x-direction.
So I would write ##V_2 = V_0 + Ax##. Other than that: yes.

One small thing: x can be many ##\mu##m, however. What you mean is ##\displaystyle {{Ax\over V}<< 1}\ ##.

From your last expression (sign corrected) : $$p_2 = \left (p_0+\frac{mg}{A}\right )\ \left (1 - \frac{\gamma A^2 x}{V_0}\right )\quad \Rightarrow \quad \Delta F = p_2A-p_1A=-\frac{\gamma A^2 }{V_0}\left (p_0+\frac{mg}{A}\right )\,x$$

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LagrangeEuler and vanhees71
LagrangeEuler said:
Is it correct to write
[tex](p_0+\frac{mg}{A})V_0^{\gamma}=p_2(V_0-Ax)^{\gamma}[/tex]?
From that
[tex]p_2=\frac{(p_0+\frac{mg}{A})V_0^{\gamma}}{(V_0-Ax)^{\gamma}}[/tex]
and
[tex]p_2=\frac{p_0+\frac{mg}{A}}{(1-\frac{Ax}{V_0})^{\gamma}}[/tex]
Can we assume here that ##x## is very small so that
[tex](1+x)^n \approx 1+nx[/tex]?
From that
[tex]p_2=\frac{p_0+\frac{mg}{A}}{1-\frac{\gamma A x}{V_0}}[/tex]
I like what you did here. But, now you can take it one step further by continuing the expansion for small x: $$p_2=(p_0+\frac{mg}{A})+(p_0+\frac{mg}{A})\frac{\gamma A x}{V_0}$$So, $$\Delta p=(p_0+\frac{mg}{A})\frac{\gamma A x}{V_0}$$So the net upward force on the ball is $$F=A\Delta p=(p_0+\frac{mg}{A})\frac{\gamma A^2 }{V_0}x$$where x is the downward displacement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LagrangeEuler and vanhees71
BvU said:
Your book says ##\ x = dV/A\ ## so it chooses a coordinate system with upwards as positive x-direction.
So I would write ##V_2 = V_0 + Ax##. Other than that: yes.

One small thing: x can be many ##\mu##m, however. What you mean is ##\displaystyle {{Ax\over V}<< 1}\ ##.

From your last expression (sign corrected) : $$p_2 = \left (p_0+\frac{mg}{A}\right )\ \left (1 - \frac{\gamma A^2 x}{V_0}\right )\quad \Rightarrow \quad \Delta F = p_2A-p_1A=-\frac{\gamma A^2 }{V_0}\left (p_0+\frac{mg}{A}\right )\,x$$

##\ ##
Thanks a lot. Could you just explain me better part ##V_0-Ax## ##\rightarrow## ##V_0+Ax##? I have problem to understand why ##V_2=V_0+Ax## and relation of this and ##x=dV/A##.
 
LagrangeEuler said:
Thanks a lot. Could you just explain me better part ##V_0-Ax## ##\rightarrow## ##V_0+Ax##? I have problem to understand why ##V_2=V_0+Ax## and relation of this and ##x=dV/A##.
If the ball moves up by a distance ##x##, the volume increases by ##Ax\ ##, that's all :smile: !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71