[Thermodynamics] Two bodies exchanging heat through a Carnot engine

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the heat exchange between two bodies with equal heat capacity (C_P) using an infinitesimal-reversible Carnot Engine until thermal equilibrium is achieved. The final temperature (T_F) of the bodies is derived as T_F = √(T_1 T_2), where T_1 and T_2 are the initial temperatures of the two bodies. The participants explore the application of the first law of thermodynamics and the Carnot efficiency, emphasizing the need to express heat and work in differential forms. The entropy variation of the entire system is also a key focus, with participants debating its implications and calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the first law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with Carnot engine principles and efficiency
  • Knowledge of entropy and its calculation (dS = ∂Q/T)
  • Ability to manipulate differential equations in thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Carnot efficiency and its implications in thermodynamic cycles
  • Learn about the mathematical treatment of entropy changes in reversible processes
  • Explore advanced thermodynamics textbooks such as "Equilibrium Thermodynamics" by Adkins for deeper insights
  • Investigate the relationship between temperature and heat transfer in thermodynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of thermodynamics, engineers working with heat engines, and anyone interested in the principles of energy transfer and efficiency in thermal systems will benefit from this discussion.

Sabian
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


It's basically the classic problem I've seen here a lot.

There are two bodies, both with equal heat capacity (C_P), one at temperature T_1 and the other at T_2. They exchange heat using an infinitesimal-reversible Carnot Engine, which will work until thermal equilibrium is reached.

I must find, first, the final temperature of the bodies (T_F) and then the entropy variation of the entire system.

Homework Equations


dU = \partial Q + \partial W (I know Q and W are non-exact differentials but I can't find the \LaTeX code for it.
dS = \frac {\partial Q}{T}
\eta = 1 - \frac {T_2}{T_1} For a Carnot Engine.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've read at least 10 threads in the site about this and still not convinced. Some of the threads affirm the entropy variation of the universe is 0, and that way is pretty easy, but in my exercise I should get the results in the opposed order (moreover, I don't see trivially that it's 0).
Then the other way, which I liked more work it from the first law of thermodynamics and the Carnot efficiency (subtly implying the 2nd Law). But they are made in a total quantities way and, although the solution is fine, I think it's more appropriate to make it in differential form as the quantities of heat vary after each cycle.

Applying the 1st law to the engine should result in
\partial Q_H + \partial Q_C + W = 0
And the heat quantities are opposite from the one I get by evaluating the bodies (if Q is flowing out of the hotter body, Q is negative, but enters to the engine as a positive amount of heat).
- C_P dT_c - C_P dT_h = - \partial W
But here the work would be the one done ON the engine which sounds weird, so if I consider the work done by the engine

C_P dT_c + C_P dT_h = \partial W But I get some problems while writing \partial W as for a Carnot Engine.

The answer is T_F = \sqrt {T_1 T_2}

Thanks for your time.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##dW## represents the work done by the engine, then the first law implies ##dW = |dQ_h| - |dQ_c|##

Keeping in mind that ##dT_h## is going to be negative, think about whether ##|dQ_h| = C_P\,dT_h## or ##|dQ_h| = -C_P\,dT_h##.

Similarly, think about ##|dQ_c|##.
 
Thanks for your reply.

Which information am I adding that way? The first law is already implied. I think I have to incorporate the fact that it's not an ordinary engine, but a Carnot one, which won't come up that way.

I thought something like

\frac {\delta W}{\delta Q_H} = \frac {|Q_H| - |Q_C|}{|Q_H|} = \frac {T'_H - T'_C}{T'_H} Where in the last equality I've used the fact that it's a reversible engine (I think), where the ' symbolizes the "instant" temperature, I mean, the appropriate temperature for each cycle.

But mathematically that hasn't led anywhere.

What are your opinions on basic Thermodynamics books? (Or should I open a new thread for this subject?). I'm reading:
  • Equilibrium Thermodynamics (Adkins)
  • Mere Thermodynamics (D. Lemons)
  • Thermodynamics (Fermi)
Which I think are fairly well, but I can't seem to solve the exercises given.

As always, thank you for your time and patience guys.
 
Last edited:
Sabian said:
\frac {\delta W}{\delta Q_H} = \frac {|Q_H| - |Q_C|}{|Q_H|} = \frac {T'_H - T'_C}{T'_H}

Try writing ##\frac {|Q_H| - |Q_C|}{|Q_H|} ## as ##1-\frac{|Q_C|}{|Q_H|}## and ##\frac {|T'_H| - |T'_C|}{|T'_H|} ## as ##1-\frac{|T'_C|}{|T'_H|}##

Then substitue for ##|Q_H|## in terms of ##C_P## and ##dT'_H## and similarly for ##|Q_C|##.
 
Thanks for such quick answers man. I'm quitting study now, it's beer time :P, but tomorrow I'll look into it and write what I get.
 
I'll start again to be more clear on the notation

First law applied to the engine:
\delta Q + \delta W_{on} = 0

\delta Q_H + \delta Q_C = - \delta W_{on}, where the work here is the on done ON the engine, so, changing for the work done BY it and considering absolute values of heat...

|\delta Q_H| - | \delta Q_C| = \delta W \ \ \ \ (1)

Then for a Carnot Engine I know the relation

\frac {\delta W}{| \delta Q_H|} = \frac {|\delta Q_H| - |\delta Q_C|} {|\delta Q_H|} = 1 - \frac {|\delta Q_C|}{|\delta Q_H|} = 1 - \frac {T_C}{T_H} Where the last step is possible due to the information that is a Carnot Engine.

Conclusion from that:
\delta W = \left ( 1 - \frac {T_C}{T_H} \right ) |\delta Q_H|

Using this information in (1) I get:

|\delta Q_H| - |\delta Q_C| = \left ( 1 - \frac {T_C}{T_H}) \right ) | \delta Q_H|

Which means

1 - \frac {|\delta Q_C|}{|\delta Q_H|} = 1 - \frac {T_C}{T_H}

Then

\frac {|\delta Q_C|}{|\delta Q_H|} = \frac {T_C}{T_H}

At this point I thought I really had it going, as it's kind of an instant-by-instant Carnot Heat-Temperatures relation. But then...
|\delta Q_C| = C_P dT_C As the cold temperature will be getting higher, then dT_C will be positive, making the whole expression greater than 0, as it should be.
|\delta Q_H| = - C_P dT_H As, contrary to the above case, the differential here will be negative.
|T_C| = T^{0}_C + dT_C Here T^{0}_C is the initial temperature of the cold body.
|T_H| = T^{0}_H + dT_H Same as above

Then putting all together I get nowhere.

\frac {C_P dT_C}{-C_P dT_H} = \frac {T^0_C + dT_C}{T^0_H + dT_H} \Longrightarrow - \frac{T^0_H}{dT_H} - 1 = \frac {T^0_C}{dT_C} + 1

Which doesn't seems very useful.

What am I missing?

Thanks for your time.

EDIT: Now I think of it, the expressions for the temperatures are bad, but can really see how to get the correct one.
 
Sabian said:
1 - \frac {|\delta Q_C|}{|\delta Q_H|} = 1 - \frac {T_C}{T_H}

Just cancel the 1's here and then substitute |\delta Q_C| = C_P dT_C and |\delta Q_H| = -C_P dT_H.

Then try to rearrange so that you can integrate.
 
You are right, I don't know why I try to make it so complicated.

Just for the exercise to be complete if someone looks for this:
- \frac {C_P dT_C}{C_P dT_H} = \frac {T_C}{T_C} \Longrightarrow \frac {dT_C}{T_C} = - \frac {dT_H}{T_H}

Then integrating that condition through the whole process
\int_{T^0_C}^{T_f} \frac {dT_C}{T_C} = - \int_{T^0_H}^{T_f} \frac {dT_H}{T_H} \Longrightarrow \log \left ( {\frac{T_f}{T^0_C}} \right ) = - \log \left ( \frac {T_f}{T^0_H} \right ) \Longrightarrow \frac {T_f}{T^0_C}= \frac {T_H}{T_f} \Longrightarrow T_f = \sqrt {T^0_C T^0_H}

Thanks a lot for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K