Thermos Bottle: Stainless Steel Inside & Out - 24h Cold & 12h Hot

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the thermal performance of a stainless steel thermos bottle, specifically addressing why the duration for which cold liquids remain cold differs from that for hot liquids. Participants explore thermodynamic principles, heat transfer mechanisms, and personal experiences with different types of thermos bottles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the difference in keeping times for cold and hot liquids is due to heat loss being proportional to the temperature difference between the liquid and the surrounding environment.
  • Others argue that the acceptable temperature ranges for cold and hot beverages may differ, potentially influencing the perceived effectiveness of the thermos.
  • A participant mentions that there is no significant thermodynamic reason for the difference, noting that radiative heat transfer affects cooling rates but may not be a major concern at typical consumption temperatures.
  • One participant challenges the claim that the difference in heat transfer is only about 5%, proposing that the effect could be larger due to the third power relationship of absolute temperature in radiative heat transfer.
  • Another participant shares personal experience, indicating that they found stainless steel vacuum flasks less effective than glass ones, suggesting that conduction may play a significant role in heat loss.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms behind the different keeping times for hot and cold liquids, with no consensus reached on the primary factors influencing these differences.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of defined conditions for testing the thermos performance, which may affect the interpretation of the manufacturer's claims. Additionally, assumptions about heat transfer mechanisms and material properties are not fully resolved.

barnabe_fisico
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
A thermology question: Keeping different cold and heat in thermos bottle
imagem_2022-07-11_102902950.png

Manufacturer information:

Interior material: stainless steel
Exterior materials: Stainless steel
Keeps cold liquid for: 24 hours
Keeps hot liquid for: 12 hI was looking for a thermos bottle and came across a situation that I'm having a hard time answering.
Why is the cold keeping time different from the warm time?
 
Science news on Phys.org
barnabe_fisico said:
Summary: A thermology question: Keeping different cold and heat in thermos bottle

Why is the cold keeping time different from the warm time?
Probably because heat loss is proportional to the difference between inside and outside temperatures.

If your room is at 70F, cold water at 40F is 30F colder than the room, but boiling water at 210F is 140F hotter than the room.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, Merlin3189, hmmm27 and 2 others
Heat transfer is proportional to the difference in temperatures. The bigger the the difference in temperature between heat source and heat sink, the faster heat will be transferred.

[nm Anorlinda beat me.]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: barnabe_fisico and anorlunda
anorlunda said:
Probably because heat loss is proportional to the difference between inside and outside temperatures.
Maybe also because the range of acceptable "cold beverage" temperatures is different than the range of acceptable "warm beverage" temperatures.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur, Merlin3189, barnabe_fisico and 2 others
barnabe_fisico said:
Summary: A thermology question: Keeping different cold and heat in thermos bottle

Why is the cold keeping time different from the warm time?
No thermodynamic reason.
( With radiative heat transfer - which is usually what is meant by a thermos - and the same temperature difference between hot and ambient, and cold and ambient. the hot will cool down slightly faster than the cold object. For temperatures of drinks that we consume the difference of power heat transfer is only about 5%, and less as the bodies approach ambient, so not a typical concern at all. )

since they do not define 'hot' or 'cold', or the 'test' conditions. it boils down to whether or not you accept their 'data' on face value, and purchase the product.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and barnabe_fisico
256bits said:
For temperatures of drinks that we consume the difference of power heat transfer is only about 5%, and less as the bodies approach ambient, so not a typical concern at all
I think the effect is quite a bit larger. Net radiated power across a constant temperature difference goes as the third power of the absolute temperature. (difference between 2 fouth powers). 5% would correspond to a temperature difference of only about 293 * (1.017) about 4 K, where the difference is more like 50K.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits
willem2 said:
I think the effect is quite a bit larger. Net radiated power across a constant temperature difference goes as the third power of the absolute temperature. (difference between 2 fouth powers). 5% would correspond to a temperature difference of only about 293 * (1.017) about 4 K, where the difference is more like 50K.
So much for the table napkin calculation.o:)
I get a much larger initial percentage now - 28%.
If hot is closer to 100 C, then the 12 hour cooling could be correct.
 
256bits said:
( With radiative heat transfer - which is usually what is meant by a thermos ...
My experience of vacuum flasks (sometimes Thermos, more often not) is that conduction is a significant route of heat loss (or gain - though I have much less experience of that.)
When I decided to buy a steel vacuum flask, because glass ones were too fragile, I quickly decided to go back to glass, because they do at least retain some heat!
I assume that both have a similar vacuum gap, and I give the benefit of the doubt to steel in hoping that (polished?) steel might be as reflective as "silvered" glass, but I suspect that even thinner stainless steel is more conductive than the glass. At any rate, I found it much less effective than my glass ones.

For both types there is a plug and I also believe heat is conducted through that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
93K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K