These are the Y parameters with the dependent source added.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of Y parameters for a specific circuit involving a dependent source. Participants are attempting to derive the Y parameters, particularly focusing on the value of y21, and are sharing their methods and results.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports finding y11, y12, and y22 as expected but struggles with y21, calculating it as 4.5 instead of the expected 4.
  • Another participant questions the correctness of the initial equations used in the calculations, suggesting that the assumption about the node voltage Va may be incorrect.
  • A participant clarifies that Va is the node voltage between two resistors and questions the labeling of nodes in the schematic.
  • One participant describes successfully obtaining the correct answer by transforming the dependent current source into a voltage source in series with a resistor, indicating uncertainty about their previous node method.
  • Another participant provides a detailed derivation of the Y parameters, suggesting that the assumption about the relationship between I2 and I1 was incorrect and presents an alternative set of equations for the Y parameters.
  • There is a discussion about the impact of the dependent source on the equations and how it modifies the Y parameters.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculation of y21, with some supporting the derived value of 4 and others presenting calculations that lead to 4.5. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct value of y21.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of node voltages and the relationships between currents in the circuit. The impact of the dependent source on the Y parameters is also a point of contention.

magnifik
Messages
350
Reaction score
0
for the following circuit, i am trying to find the y parameters
a4a1og.jpg


i have found y11, y12, and y22 to match the answer that my text provides, but i am having trouble with y21

the solution given is y11 = 1.5, y12 = -0.5, y21 = 4, y22 = -0.5

in trying to solve for y21, i get 4.5
this is what i attempted:
short the voltage source at port 2
I1 = (v1 - va)/2 - v1
= -0.5(v1/2 - 3I1 - v1) - v1
= -0.5(-0.5v1 - 3I1) - v1
= 0.25v1 + 1.5I1 - v1
-0.5I1 = -0.75v1
I2 = 3I1
I1 = (1/3)I2
-0.5((1/3)I2) = -0.75v1
y21 = I2/v1 = 18/4 = 4.5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
magnifik said:
for the following circuit, i am trying to find the y parameters
a4a1og.jpg


i have found y11, y12, and y22 to match the answer that my text provides, but i am having trouble with y21

the solution given is y11 = 1.5, y12 = -0.5, y21 = 4, y22 = -0.5

in trying to solve for y21, i get 4.5
this is what i attempted:
short the voltage source at port 2
I1 = (v1 - va)/2 - v1
= -0.5(v1/2 - 3I1 - v1) - v1
= -0.5(-0.5v1 - 3I1) - v1
= 0.25v1 + 1.5I1 - v1
-0.5I1 = -0.75v1
I2 = 3I1
I1 = (1/3)I2
-0.5((1/3)I2) = -0.75v1
y21 = I2/v1 = 18/4 = 4.5

1. What is Va? Looks like you meant Va = output = 0, in which case your 1st equation is incorrect.
2. I suggest writing an expression for the sum of currents at the output = 0 to start.
 
Va is the node voltage between the two 2-Ohm resistors. why is the first equation incorrect?
 
magnifik said:
Va is the node voltage between the two 2-Ohm resistors. why is the first equation incorrect?

What happened to your schematic? It's been removed!

So I don't know for sure which node you're talking about. But since there are,as I recall, only two- is Va the output node? If it is, why call it Va when it's in fact V2?
 
Last edited:
2hz2160.jpg

i obtained the correct answer by transforming the dependent current source into a voltage source in series with the 2 ohm resistor. i was doing something wrong in the node method. I'm still not sure what it is.
 
That's a perfectly good way to do it.

Labeling the resistors R1, R2, R3 from left to right and summing currents at the output:

V1/R2 + I2 = 3I1
V1/R2 + I2 = 3V1/R where R = R1||R2
V1/2 + I2 = 3V1/(2/3) = 9V1/2
I2 = 9V1/2 - V1/2 = 8V1/2 = 4V1
I2/V1 = 4
 
rude man said:
That's a perfectly good way to do it.

Labeling the resistors R1, R2, R3 from left to right and summing currents at the output:

V1/R2 + I2 = 3I1
V1/R2 + I2 = 3V1/R where R = R1||R2
V1/2 + I2 = 3V1/(2/3) = 9V1/2
I2 = 9V1/2 - V1/2 = 8V1/2 = 4V1
I2/V1 = 4

thanks for that. i just realized now you had said Va = 0 according to the way i had defined it. that cleared things up.
 
magnifik said:
i was doing something wrong in the node method. I'm still not sure what it is.

Your assumption that I2 = 3I1 was wrong.

The Y parameters for a two port like you show are defined like this:

y11 V1 + y12 V2 = I1
y21 V1 + y22 V2 = I2

If we delete the dependent source, it's easy to derive the Y parameters for the resistors only:

1.5 V1 - .5 V2 = I1
-.5 V1 + 1 V2 = I2

In other words:

y11 = 1.5
y12 = -.5
y21 = -.5
y22 = 1

If we go back to the general Y parameter equations:

y11 V1 + y12 V2 = I1
y21 V1 + y22 V2 = I2

We can simply add the dependent source to the right side of the second equation since it's a current source applied to the V2 node:

y11 V1 + y12 V2 = I1
y21 V1 + y22 V2 = I2-3*I1

We see that the first equation tells us that I1 = y11 V1 + y12 V2, so our equations become:

y11 V1 + y12 V2 = I1
y21 V1 + y22 V2 = I2-3*(y11 V1 + y12 V2)

which becomes:

y11 V1 + y12 V2 = I1
(3 y11+y21) V1 + (3 y12+y22) V2 = I2

or we could write them as:

y11 V1 + y12 V2 = I1
y'21 V1 + y'22 V2 = I2

with y'21 representing the y21 parameter after the dependent source is added.

Substituting numerical values:

1.5 V1 - .5 V2 = I1
(3*1.5-.5) V1 + (3*(-.5)+1) V2 = I2

and finally:

1.5 V1 - .5 V2 = I1
4 V1 -.5 V2 = I2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K