This guy has written over 5,000 pages of scholarly material-all for others. Wow.

  • Thread starter Thread starter proof
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the implications of a shadow scholar who has produced over 5,000 pages of academic material, including entire theses, for students. Participants express concern about the integrity of the education system, questioning how such work can pass through academic scrutiny without raising red flags. The conversation highlights the prevalence of cheating in academia, particularly in lower-level courses, and raises doubts about the quality of education and the motivations of students pursuing degrees primarily for job prospects rather than genuine learning. Many contributors emphasize the need for a shift in mindset regarding education, advocating for a focus on personal growth rather than merely obtaining a degree. The efficiency and claims of the shadow scholar are met with skepticism, with some questioning how he can produce such a volume of work and whether he truly meets academic standards. Overall, the thread underscores a broader issue of academic dishonesty and the challenges faced by educators in assessing student learning.
  • #31


The one thing that I do not understand is how they can do the oral defense. Sure, they have done all of the research and will probably know what they are talking about. But if one of the people on the commitee asks about a specific part of the paper I feel like it would be tough to talk about it if you didnt actually write it. Yeah, I get that you will obviously read what this guy wrote but one would be much more familiar with one's own work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


DR13 said:
The one thing that I do not understand is how they can do the oral defense. Sure, they have done all of the research and will probably know what they are talking about. But if one of the people on the commitee asks about a specific part of the paper I feel like it would be tough to talk about it if you didnt actually write it. Yeah, I get that you will obviously read what this guy wrote but one would be much more familiar with one's own work.

Presumably the graduate students that use his services do *something* with their time. They might read things that their supervisor provides, or read things that the writer references. They will know something about the work, and in a meeting with their supervisor or say an oral exam, might just come across as being very nervous and struggle to articulate themselves verbally. But if they've provided a reasonable quality paper or thesis...

It's an interesting topic for sure and whilst I'm not sure about whether he exaggerates the numbers or not, I don't think it really matters. Clearly this guy and lots of other people he knows make a living out of this sort of thing. Though the numbers are still very small, it's a problem that the academic system can do without. Perhaps instead of dishing out threats for cheating, or punishments for not getting good enough grades we need more effort in encouraging students to understand the benefits of the assignments that are being set. It's quite difficult to convince someone of the full value in some seemingly arbitrary essay work, when all they're thinking about is grades to pass the year.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K