This guy has written over 5,000 pages of scholarly material-all for others. Wow.

  • Thread starter Thread starter proof
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around a writer who has produced over 5,000 pages of academic material in a year, raising concerns about academic integrity and the implications of outsourcing thesis writing. Participants express skepticism about the quality of such work, particularly in fields requiring rigorous standards like math and science. The conversation highlights the systemic issues in education, where the focus on grades can overshadow genuine learning, and questions the effectiveness of current evaluation methods in distinguishing between competent students and those relying on external help.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of academic integrity and its implications in higher education
  • Familiarity with thesis and dissertation requirements in graduate programs
  • Knowledge of the challenges faced by educators in large classroom settings
  • Awareness of the impact of outsourcing academic writing on student learning
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ethical implications of academic ghostwriting services
  • Explore methods for improving academic integrity in universities
  • Investigate the effectiveness of current assessment techniques in higher education
  • Learn about the role of teaching assistants in grading and evaluation processes
USEFUL FOR

Educators, academic administrators, students in higher education, and anyone interested in the integrity of academic work and the challenges of modern educational practices.

  • #31


The one thing that I do not understand is how they can do the oral defense. Sure, they have done all of the research and will probably know what they are talking about. But if one of the people on the commitee asks about a specific part of the paper I feel like it would be tough to talk about it if you didnt actually write it. Yeah, I get that you will obviously read what this guy wrote but one would be much more familiar with one's own work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


DR13 said:
The one thing that I do not understand is how they can do the oral defense. Sure, they have done all of the research and will probably know what they are talking about. But if one of the people on the commitee asks about a specific part of the paper I feel like it would be tough to talk about it if you didnt actually write it. Yeah, I get that you will obviously read what this guy wrote but one would be much more familiar with one's own work.

Presumably the graduate students that use his services do *something* with their time. They might read things that their supervisor provides, or read things that the writer references. They will know something about the work, and in a meeting with their supervisor or say an oral exam, might just come across as being very nervous and struggle to articulate themselves verbally. But if they've provided a reasonable quality paper or thesis...

It's an interesting topic for sure and whilst I'm not sure about whether he exaggerates the numbers or not, I don't think it really matters. Clearly this guy and lots of other people he knows make a living out of this sort of thing. Though the numbers are still very small, it's a problem that the academic system can do without. Perhaps instead of dishing out threats for cheating, or punishments for not getting good enough grades we need more effort in encouraging students to understand the benefits of the assignments that are being set. It's quite difficult to convince someone of the full value in some seemingly arbitrary essay work, when all they're thinking about is grades to pass the year.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K