This shows that the parallelogram law holds for complex numbers.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the Parallelogram Law for complex numbers using algebraic manipulation. The participants, including Daniel and dextercioby, demonstrate the proof by expanding the expressions |z+w|^2 and |z-w|^2, leading to the conclusion that 2(|z|^2 + |w|^2) holds true. They utilize both vector methods and complex number notation, confirming that the calculations are accurate and consistent with the law. The conversation emphasizes the validity of the proof and clarifies any initial confusion regarding the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation and expansion of expressions
  • Knowledge of vector methods and dot products
  • Concept of complex conjugates and their application
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex numbers in depth
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of complex numbers
  • Explore vector methods in higher dimensions
  • Investigate additional proofs of the Parallelogram Law in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in the properties of complex numbers and their applications in geometry and algebra.

Kahsi
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi :smile:

I just started to look at complex numbers.

Prove the ``Parallellogram law''
http://www.sosmath.com/complex/number/complexplane/img4.gif


This is how I solved it:

z=a+bi
w=c+di

|z+w|^2=\sqrt{(a+c)^2+(b+d)^2}=a^2+2ac+c^2+b^2+2bd+d^2

then we have

|z-w|^2=\sqrt{(a-c)^2+(b-d)^2}=a^2-2ac+c^2+b^2-2bd+d^2

2(|z|^2+|w|^2)=2((a^2+b^2)+(c^2+d^2)) = 2a^2+2b^2+2c^2+2d^2

a^2+2ac+c^2+b^2+2bd+d^2+a^2-2ac+c^2+b^2-2bd+d^2=2a^2+2b^2+2c^2+2d^2

My question is:

Was my calculation OK or was it a misscalculation (a lucky one which prooved the formula)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Those 2 radicals should be squared.Or should be absent altogether.

The rest is okay.

Daniel.
 
Oh...That was a typo :blushing:

Thank you dextercioby :cool:
 
vector methods are nice too. i.e. |z+w|^2 = (z+w).(z+w), (dot product),

and |z-w|^2 = (z-w).(z-w).

Expanding and adding, the cross terms cancel, leaving

z.z + w.w + z.z + w.w = 2(|z|^2 + |w|^2).



you can do this with complex numbers notation too, no vectors. i.e. let zbar be the conjugate of the complex number z. Then |z|^2 = z(zbar).

Hence |z+w|^2 = (z+w)([z+w]bar). But bar commutes with sums and products, so this equals

(z+w)(zbar + wbar) = z(zbar) + w(wbar) + wzbar + zwbar.

Similarly |z-w|^2 = z(zbar) + w(wbar) - wzbar - zwbar.

so the sum is 2 (z[zbar] + w[wbar]) = 2 (|z|^2 + |w|^2).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
802
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K