This solution does not make sense to me (dynamics)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pascal1p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics Homework
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a dynamics problem involving a spring and a block system. Participants are exploring the conditions under which the normal force becomes zero and the implications of spring compression and equilibrium positions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the relationship between the spring's unstretched position and the conditions for the normal force to be zero. Questions are raised about the definitions of equilibrium and unstretched positions, as well as the implications of pushing the spring down a distance 'd'.

Discussion Status

Some participants are questioning the explanations provided and expressing confusion about the mechanics involved. There is a recognition that the minimum value for 'd' is significant, and discussions are ongoing about how this relates to the forces acting on the block and pan system.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the explanations in the original problem may lack clarity, leading to differing interpretations of the spring dynamics and the conditions for separation between the block and the pan.

Pascal1p
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


5GBsGgp.png


Homework Equations


F=m*a

The Attempt at a Solution


Don't worry it not a homework question of mine. I was just trying to solve some questions (on my own) that I know I have difficulty with to get better at it. Especially with springs I can get confused, so I thought I would try that.
With this question I got stuck and I know that it was because I set the unstretched length as when the spring went a distance 'd' back, but of course he is only at equilibrium then and not unstretched then.

But still I don't get the answer. They talk about that if y=d then N=0, but to me that does not seem right.
y(equilibrium) + d, is the position he would be at when you press it down measured from the unstretched position?
As I see it they saying, at the position the Block A is when it is being pushed down and released from rest, at that point there is no Fn working on it. Which would be silly.
N=0 should be the point when the string is in unstretched position, since at that moment Block A and Pan B should separate? So N=0 when F(spring)= 0= k*s, so when s=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pascal1p said:
But still I don't get the answer. They talk about that if y=d then N=0, but to me that does not seem right.
y(equilibrium) + d, is the position he would be at when you press it down measured from the unstretched position?
I agree it is not well explained. Worse, it is wrong
If you depress the spring by distance d from equilibrium and release, it will oscillate equally about its equilibrium, so will rise distance d above equilibrium.
The mass will separate from the pan when its acceleration is g down (i.e. no normal force). At the instant this happens, the pan's acceleration must be the same, despite being attached to the spring. Hence, at this instant, there is also no force between the pan and the spring, i.e. the spring is at its unstretched length. But note that in that reasoning we have not specified how far the spring was pushed down initially. In other words, as long as you push it down far enough that spring reached its uncompressed length the block will separate from the pan at that instant.
The answer obtained above is only the minimum value for d; any larger value will also work.
 
haruspex said:
I agree it is not well explained. Worse, it is wrong
If you depress the spring by distance d from equilibrium and release, it will oscillate equally about its equilibrium, so will rise distance d above equilibrium.
The mass will separate from the pan when its acceleration is g down (i.e. no normal force). At the instant this happens, the pan's acceleration must be the same, despite being attached to the spring. Hence, at this instant, there is also no force between the pan and the spring, i.e. the spring is at its unstretched length. But note that in that reasoning we have not specified how far the spring was pushed down initially. In other words, as long as you push it down far enough that spring reached its uncompressed length the block will separate from the pan at that instant.
The answer obtained above is only the minimum value for d; any larger value will also work.

That minimum value of d, does it correspond with the answer they give?
I don't get that they do Fspring= k*(Yeq + Y) and then say if Y=d then N=0.
Because like you said N=0 is at unstretched position, so when Fspring= 0
Fspring = k*(Yeq+d) that corresponds to the springforce on the pan, when the pan is pushed down with 'distance' d?
 
Pascal1p said:
That minimum value of d, does it correspond with the answer they give?
I don't get that they do Fspring= k*(Yeq + Y) and then say if Y=d then N=0.
Because like you said N=0 is at unstretched position, so when Fspring= 0
Fspring = k*(Yeq+d) that corresponds to the springforce on the pan, when the pan is pushed down with 'distance' d?
Yes, the value they get is the amount it has to be depressed in order that it will bounce up to the relaxed height. This is very easy to calculate; they really made it harder than it is. We know the equilibrium position is d=total weight/k below the relaxed position. If depressed by y from equilibrium and released it will oscillate +/-y about equilibrium, so to oscillate up to relaxed position it must be depressed by the same d.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K