Thomson Scattering when low-intensity light meets an orbital electron

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limitations of Thomson Scattering in explaining the interaction of low-intensity light with electrons, particularly in the context of wave-particle duality and relativistic or quantum mechanical effects. Participants explore the implications of light intensity on scattering phenomena and the relationship between classical and quantum theories.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that Thomson Scattering cannot account for wavelength shifts at low light intensities, suggesting that classical theories fail to explain the behavior of light as both a wave and a particle.
  • Others assert that at low intensity, a classical electromagnetic wave only causes charged particles to oscillate at the same frequency as the radiation, without producing radiation of a different frequency.
  • A participant questions the relationship between intensity, defined as the number of photons passing a point over time, and Thomson scattering, seeking clarity on how this affects the scattering process.
  • Some contributions highlight that classical theory allows for light to carry momentum, which could lead to Doppler shifts upon reflection, but at low intensity, the effects are minimal due to small energy absorption and recoil momentum.
  • One participant references the Compton wavelength and its relevance to the scattering of photons, noting that the changes in wavelength due to Thomson scattering are negligible compared to the Compton wavelength, which is significant in the gamma-ray range.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the Compton effect does not serve as proof of the quantization of the electromagnetic field, as it can be explained using semiclassical approximations where only the electron is treated quantum mechanically.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of low versus high intensity on Thomson scattering, with no consensus reached on the relationship between intensity and scattering phenomena. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the adequacy of classical theories in explaining these interactions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of intensity and the unresolved nature of how classical and quantum theories interact in this context. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the relationship between wavelength, frequency, and scattering effects.

cemtu
Messages
99
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
Low-Intensity?
Can you explain to me the reason why Thomson Scattering can not explain what happens when light meets an electron at low intensity, and what does that have to do with light being a wave or particle or relativistic/QM effects?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_scattering
"Effect is significant because it demonstrates that light cannot be explained purely as a wave phenomenon.[4] Thomson scattering, the classical theory of an electromagnetic wave scattered by charged particles, cannot explain shifts in wavelength at low intensity: classically, light of sufficient intensity for the electric field to accelerate a charged particle to a relativistic speed will cause radiation-pressure recoil and an associated Doppler shift of the scattered light,[5] but the effect would become arbitrarily small at sufficiently low light intensities regardless of wavelength."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A classical, low intensity electromagnetic wave can only make a charged particle oscillate at the same frequency as the radiation. There is nothing that would produce radiation of a different frequency.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cemtu
mfb said:
A classical, low intensity electromagnetic wave can only make a charged particle oscillate at the same frequency as the radiation. There is nothing that would produce radiation of a different frequency.
Okay, but what does low intensity have to do with anything? Intensity is the amount of photons that pass from one point in a time interval, right? So, what is the relationship between this definition and Thomson scattering?
 
In the classical theory, there was the possibility of light carrying momentum, and therefore exerting force when absorbed or reflected. Reflection could accelerate the reflector and therefore cause Doppler shifting of reflected light.
However, in classical non-quantum theory, absorption and reflection are continuous processes. Therefore at low intensity (although high frequency), the scattered light should cause a small absorbed energy at any unit time, small recoil momentum at any unit time, small Doppler shift...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cemtu
snorkack said:
In the classical theory, there was the possibility of light carrying momentum, and therefore exerting force when absorbed or reflected. Reflection could accelerate the reflector and therefore cause Doppler shifting of reflected light.
However, in classical non-quantum theory, absorption and reflection are continuous processes. Therefore at low intensity (although high frequency), the scattered light should cause a small absorbed energy at any unit time, small recoil momentum at any unit time, small Doppler shift...
Okay but what about high intensity? what does change?
 
Take the famous formula given in the Wikipedia article
$$\lambda'-\lambda=\lambda_{\text{C}} (1-\cos \theta).$$
Here ##\lambda_{\text{C}}=h/(m_{\text{e}} c)## is the Compton wavelength and ##\theta## the scattering angle of the photon. The largest change you thus get at ##\theta=\pi##. Then the change in wavelength twice of the Compton wave-length, which is about ##2.4 \cdot 10^{-12} \text{m}##, which is in the ##\gamma##-ray range.

Visible light is at wave-lengths of 400-800 nm or ##(4-8)\cdot10^{-7} \text{m}##. Here the change in wave length (i.e., the momentum transfer to the electron) at the order of the Compoton wave-length of the electron is thus completely negligible and can be neglected. This is described by Thomson scattering.

All this has little to do with the intensity of the light but rather with his wavelength/frequency.

Also note that the Compton effect is not a proof for the quantization of the em. field. In fact it has been theoretically explained with modern quantum theory first in the semiclassical approximation, i.e., by treating only the electron quantum mechanically and keeping the em. field classical (Klein and Nishina 1929).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein–Nishina_formula

Contrary to the Wikipedia article. It's not a calculation in full QED but the treatment of the motion of an electron according to the Dirac equation (in the 1st-quantization formalism) in a plane-wave classical em. radiation field.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cemtu and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K