Thoughts/Questions on the ban of free energy discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter donpacino
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the ban of free energy and perpetual motion topics on the forum, with participants questioning the rationale behind this prohibition. Concerns are raised that banning these discussions may discourage new users and prevent educational opportunities, as many inquiries stem from genuine curiosity or misunderstandings of basic physics. Suggestions include creating an FAQ to address common misconceptions, which could provide valuable resources without reopening contentious debates. Participants acknowledge the challenges of managing discussions with individuals who may be resistant to scientific explanations. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for a balanced approach to fostering understanding while maintaining forum integrity.
  • #31
anorlunda said:
I looked at that forum and it is far from free-and-open, it is tightly regulated. Although it invites challenges to mainstream science, it requires the OP to promptly defend his/her theory against every objection. Of the 6 ATM threads I looked at, all 6 were closed after post #2 when the OP could not explain how their theory explains existing observational evidence. When they get a personal theory post on another forum, they move it to this ATM forum making it subject to the ATM rules. Via strict enforcement of that rule, they do not allow wild discussions to go on and on. The main different between ATM and PF is that they just close the threads after post #2, rather than deleting them at post #1.
Meaning it's an unproductive waste of good member's time. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hey Everyone,

Sorry for taking so long to respond. Work had a flareup last week and I never got to respond. I have read through all the responses and am almost done with an initial draft, using quite a few of your suggestions. I will follow up in a few days!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
430
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K