Three body problem and numerical method

Click For Summary
A numerical method to solve a three-body problem involves using numerical integrators to evolve the system's equations of motion, typically due to gravitational forces. The complexity arises because the equations are not separable, necessitating iterative solutions like Euler's method. Examples include the Sun, Earth, and Moon system, where gravitational interactions complicate the motion of celestial bodies. The discussion also touches on the transition from a three-body to a two-body problem based on mass and distance, questioning whether proximity or physical contact alters the classification. Ultimately, the determination of whether a system is a three-body or two-body problem can depend on specific conditions and subjective judgment.
Rothiemurchus
Messages
203
Reaction score
1
What is meant by " a numerical method to solve a three body problem?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3-body usually means based on some physical force...numerical method i would assume to be the numerical integrator that maintains/evolves the system (eg integrator for gravity or potential).
 
it means the equation is not separable for the equations of motion to get an explicit equation. You have to iterate to find the solution using eulers method.
 
Typically, a three body problem is extremely hard to put into numerical form. If someone has a numerical solution for a three body problem it would have to involve one force, where vectors would be used to solve the problem. The Sun, Earth and moon are a three body problem. The force involved in each case is that of gravitation. Trying to describe the motion of the Earth with a numerical solution is not straight forward. In the case of Hydrogen, one electron orbits a proton- a two body system. Bohr's theory was a solution to this two body problem, it equated electrostatic force or coulomb's law with an inward centripetal force. In the case of Helium, we have two electrons and one nucleus, a three body problem. In this case a solution is extremely difficult, because we have to consider not only the attraction between the electrons and the proton, but also electron-electron repulsion.
In order to be relevant we really need to know what three body problem you are referring too.
 
If we had a solar system with a sun and just one planet, with one moon going around this planet, this would be a three body problem.Can we assume that because the sun is large it is a fixed point,and that the moon is small and does not affect the motion of the planet too much, the movement of the planet around the sun is a two body problem?Does a large distance between some masses reduce a problem from being three body to two body? How do we decide when a three body problem has become a two body problem?
Is there some equation that tells us this or is it a subective judgement?
If the planet and moon physically touch one another do they become one body?
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K