Three charges located on a straight line

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the position of charge Q3 relative to charges Q1 and Q2 such that the net force on Q3 is zero. Given the charges Q1 = 1.56 μC, Q2 = -3.03 μC, and Q3 = 3.18 μC, with Q1 and Q2 fixed 0.268 m apart and Q3 initially positioned 0.169 m to the right of Q2, the participants clarify that Q3 must be placed between Q1 and Q2 to achieve force cancellation. The forces exerted by Q1 and Q2 on Q3 must be analyzed to find the correct position where these forces balance each other out.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for calculating electric forces
  • Understanding of electric charge interactions
  • Quadratic equations for solving force balance problems
  • Concept of net force and equilibrium in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Coulomb's Law in different charge configurations
  • Learn how to set up and solve quadratic equations in physics problems
  • Explore the concept of electric field and potential in electrostatics
  • Investigate the conditions for equilibrium in systems of multiple charges
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone interested in solving problems related to electric forces and charge interactions.

yzphysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three charges, Q1, Q2 and Q3 are located on a straight line. The charge Q3 is located 0.169 m to the right of Q2. The charges Q1 = 1.56 μC and Q2 = -3.03 μC are fixed at their positions, distance 0.268 m apart, and the charge Q3 = 3.18 μC could be moved along the line. For what position of Q3 relative to Q1 is the net force on Q3 due to Q1 and Q2 zero? Give your answer in meters, and use the plus sign for Q3 to the right of Q1.

Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law: F=(k(q^2))/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


(k*Q3*Q2)/r^2 = (k*Q3*Q1)/ (r+0.268)^2

After setting it up, I noticed that k and Q3 on both sides cancel out which leaves me with:
(Q2)/r^2 = (Q1)/ (r+0.268)^2

(3.02*10^-6)/r^2 = (1.56*10^-6)/(r+0.268)^2

Then, I got a quadratic formula: 1.47*r^2 + 1.62*r +.2176

so r is equal to -0.157m and -0.945m

but none of the two is right. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation assumes that Q3 is to the right of Q2. That's why your solutions do not make sense. What other region can you try?

Generally, it's a good idea to figure out which region makes sense before you try to solve for the exact location.
 
I thought that "charge Q3 is located 0.169 m to the right of Q2" means that the point charges are at this order Q1---------Q2----.169-------Q3

Are the point charges supposed to be at this order: Q1------Q3-----Q2?
 
yzphysics said:
I thought that "charge Q3 is located 0.169 m to the right of Q2" means that the point charges are at this order Q1---------Q2----.169-------Q3
Sure, that's what that means, of course. But then they said you can slide Q3 around. (So I have no idea why they gave you an initial position for Q3, unless there are multiple parts to this problem.)
 
Would you set up Q3 to be between Q1 and Q2?
 
yzphysics said:
Would you set up Q3 to be between Q1 and Q2?
Consider the directions of the forces on Q3. Could they cancel in that region?
 
When Q3 is placed between Q1 and Q2, it will cause the charge to move like this: <--Q1 (+), Q3 (+)-->, Q2 (-)
So overall, the charge does cancels out.
 
yzphysics said:
When Q3 is placed between Q1 and Q2, it will cause the charge to move like this: <--Q1 (+), Q3 (+)-->, Q2 (-)
So overall, the charge does cancels out.
Rethink this. What is the direction of the force exerted by Q1 on Q3? The force exerted by Q2 on Q3?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K