Throw a Ball: Find Height Above Ground After .7s

  • Thread starter Thread starter VU2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the height of a ball above the ground after 0.7 seconds of being thrown, starting from an initial position of <0.06, 1.03, 0> m with an average velocity of <17, 4, 6> m/s. The correct formula to determine the final height is derived as y = 1.03 + 4(0.7), resulting in a height of 3.83 m. Participants clarify the calculation of average velocity and its implications on determining initial velocity, emphasizing the importance of understanding the relationship between average and instantaneous velocities in projectile motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic kinematics principles
  • Familiarity with projectile motion equations
  • Knowledge of average velocity calculations
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equations of motion for projectile trajectories
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on projectile motion
  • Explore the concept of instantaneous velocity versus average velocity
  • Investigate the impact of varying time intervals on velocity calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding projectile motion and velocity calculations.

VU2
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Q1) You throw a ball. Assume that the origin is on the ground, with +y-axis pointing upward. Just after the ball leaves your hand its positon is <.06,1.03,0>m. The average velocity of the ball over the next .7s is <17,4,6>m/s. At time .7s after the ball leaves your hand, what is the height of the ball above the ground.

y=1.03+4(.7)-9.8/2×(.7^2)
y=1.429 is my answer, is this correct? I'm using the average velocity as initial, so I'm not sure if I can assume that or not.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
I'm using the average velocity as initial, so I'm not sure if I can assume that or not.
Probably not.
Check it to see if it matters. Depends how accurate your answer needs to be.
You know the acceleration and the average velocity, can you find the y-component of the initial instantaneous velocity.
Note: how is "average velocity" calculated?
 
Last edited:
AvgV is calculated by (finalV+initalV)/2=AvgV, can i assume that initial V is 0?
 
No, you can't assume that. You can, however, calculate the final velocity in terms of the initial velocity, given the acceleration and the time. That will allow you to get the initial velocity from the average.
 
Oh I see, y-final=y-initial + v(avg)*(t). Therefore, y-final=1.03+4(.7)=3.83?
 
That will work, too, more directly than what I suggested. I don't know what the notation "<17,4,6>" means, so I don't know if your answer is right.
 
That is the average velocity vector.
 
I'm curious now, how would you compute it your way?
 
VU2 said:
That is the average velocity vector.
That's what I thought, but I was wondering why the z direction was there, since it isn't mentioned in the rest of the problem.
 
  • #10
VU2 said:
I'm curious now, how would you compute it your way?
I explained it above. It is essentially the same, except that it takes a roundabout way to get there (basically deriving the equation you used).
 
  • #11
Oh I see, thanks!
 
  • #12
AvgV is calculated by (finalV+initalV)/2=AvgV, can i assume that initial V is 0?
Average velocity is change in position over change in time:
##\bar{v}=\Delta y/\Delta t = (y_f-y_i)/\Delta t##
... you rearranged that equation to give you the final height given the initial height and the average velocity ... well done.

As an exercise - how would it have been different for the same figures, except the average velocity was timed over 0.1s, but you still want the final height after 0.7s?
 
  • #13
Simon Bridge,

Sorry, I was suppose to get back to you sooner. That's an interesting question. I'm not sure how I would approach it, to be honest.
 
  • #14
Well - in that case you'd have two time periods ot consider: one short one (with a displacement) to establish the initial velocity and another, longer, one to find the answer. Otherwise the approach is identical to the one you used above.

IRL you often measure the speed of something by timing it over a short distance, and then use that information to work out where the thing will end up.
 
  • #15
Simon Bridge,

Yeah that's what I figured too. Thanks for the lesson.
 
  • #16
No worries - have fun :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K