Throwing a ball from atop a hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter swevener
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Hill
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the optimal angle ##\theta## for a boy throwing a rock from a hill sloping downward at angle ##\phi## to achieve maximum range. The key equations utilized include the kinematic equations for motion and the relationship between angles derived from trigonometric identities. The participants identified that the initial approach using a rotated reference frame led to an erroneous result of -75º, which was later corrected by reverting to the original frame, confirming that the correct angle for ##\phi = 60º## is indeed ##\theta = 15º##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically ##\mathbf{s} = \mathbf{v}_0 t + \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{a} t^2## and ##\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{v}_0 + \mathbf{a} t##.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities and their application in projectile motion.
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations, particularly rotating reference frames.
  • Basic calculus for differentiation and solving equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations without coordinate transformations.
  • Learn about the effects of different angles on projectile trajectories in physics.
  • Explore advanced kinematics, including the impact of varying slopes on projectile motion.
  • Investigate the use of simulation tools for visualizing projectile motion under different conditions.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and projectile motion, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to angles and trajectories in kinematics.

swevener
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A boy stands at the peak of a hill which slopes downward uniformly at angle ##\phi##. At what angle ##\theta## from the horizontal should he throw a rock so that it has the greatest range?

Homework Equations


##\mathbf{s} = \mathbf{v}_0 t + \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{a} t^2##

##\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{v}_0 + \mathbf{a} t##

The Attempt at a Solution


First I tilted the reference frame so the sloping hill is horizontal and the initial velocity is at an angle ##\theta + \phi## from the ground. This makes the acceleration ##\mathbf{a} = g \sin(\phi) \hat{\imath} - g \cos(\phi) \hat{\jmath}##. So position is given by
\mathbf{s} = \left[ v_0 t \cos(\theta + \phi) + \frac12 g t^2 \sin(\phi) \right] \hat{\imath} + \left[ v_0 t \sin(\theta + \phi) - \frac12 g t^2 \cos(\phi) \right] \hat{\jmath}. Taking the derivative with respect to time,
\mathbf{v} = \left[ v_0 \cos(\theta + \phi) + g t \sin(\phi) \right] \hat{\imath} + \left[ v_0 \sin(\theta + \phi) - g t \cos(\phi) \right] \hat{\jmath}.Setting the vertical component of velocity equal to zero gives half the total flight time:
t_{\text{max}} = \frac{v_0 \sin(\theta + \phi)}{g \cos(\theta)}. Plugging ##2 t_{\text{max}}## into the horizontal component of ##\mathbf{s}## gives the distance traveled:
\begin{align}s_x (2 t_{\text{max}}) &amp;= v_0 \frac{2 v_0 \sin(\theta + \phi)}{g \cos(\phi)} \cos(\theta + \phi) + \frac12 g \sin(\phi) \frac{4 v_0^2 \sin^2(\theta + \phi)}{\cos^2(\phi)} \\<br /> &amp;= \frac{2 v_0^2}{g \cos(\phi)} [ \sin(\theta + \phi) \cos(\theta + \phi) + \sin^2(\theta + \phi) \tan(\phi) ].\end{align}
To find the optimal ##\theta## for a given ##\phi##, take
\begin{align}\frac{\text{d}}{\text{d} \theta} s_x (2 t_{\text{max}}) = 0 &amp;= \cos(\theta + \phi) \cos(\theta + \phi) - \sin(\theta + \phi) \sin(\theta + \phi) + 2 \sin(\theta + \phi) \cos(\theta + \phi) \tan(\phi) \\<br /> &amp;= \cos^2(\theta + \phi) - \sin^2(\theta + \phi) + \sin(2(\theta + \phi)) \tan(\phi) \\<br /> &amp;= \cos(2(\theta + \phi)) + \sin(2(\theta + \phi)) \tan(\phi).\end{align} A bit of algebra gives
\tan(2(\theta + \phi)) = - \cot(\phi), which results in an equation for ##\theta##
\theta = \frac12 \arctan(-\cot(\phi)) - \phi.
Now, the book's hint was that when ##\phi## is 60º, ##\theta## should be 15º. My equation spits out -75º, which has the slight problem of meaning the boy would be throwing the rock through the hill. So my question is why am I off by 90º? Did I make a mistake in my math somewhere? Does it have to do with rotating my reference frame? :frown:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well -75 degrees seems suspiciously like 15 degrees

so your book says it slopes down at 60 degrees so should you be using -60 degrees?

I would try to solve it without the rotation to see if things work out.
 
Last edited:
It seems to me my equation should be spitting out 15º, not 15º - 90º.
 
jedishrfu said:
so your book says it slopes down at 60 degrees so should you be using -60 degrees?

I would try to solve it without the rotation to see if things work out.

Using -60º just gives me +75º. I've played with all the signs; the only answer that (sort of) works out is the one I got.

And solving the problem without the frame rotation is all kinds of unpleasant.
 
swevener said:
And solving the problem without the frame rotation is all kinds of unpleasant.
Not really.
Flight time t, hor dist x, vert dist y (measuring positive downwards), accn a, initial velocity u at θ above horizontal:
-ut sin(θ) + at2/2 = y = x tan(ϕ) = ut cos(θ)tan(ϕ)
at/2u = tan(ϕ)cos(θ) + sin(θ)
xa/u2 = 2tan(ϕ)cos2(θ) + 2 sin(θ)cos(θ) = tan(ϕ)(cos(2θ)+1) + sin(2θ)
For max x:
tan(ϕ)(-2sin(2θ)) + 2cos(2θ) = 0
tan(ϕ) = cot(2θ)
ϕ = π/2 - 2θ
 
haruspex said:
Not really.

Well, it was the way I was trying to do it, but if anything I've learned that I tend to overcomplicate things.

Anyway, I figured out the problem was my rotated frame. I plugged the ##2 t_{\text{max}}## I got above into the unrotated horizontal component of the distance equation and got the same equation haruspex did. Though I still don't know why rotating my frame an arbitrary angle offset my answer by exactly 90º.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
941
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K