Throwing a ball from atop a hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter swevener
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Hill
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a boy throwing a rock from the peak of a hill that slopes downward at a specific angle, seeking to determine the angle of projection that maximizes the range of the throw. The discussion centers around the physics of projectile motion and the effects of the hill's slope on the trajectory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of rotating the reference frame to simplify calculations, questioning whether this leads to an offset in the resulting angle of projection.
  • Some participants suggest re-evaluating the angle of the hill's slope and its effect on the calculations.
  • There is discussion about the complexity of solving the problem without the frame rotation and the potential for overcomplicating the approach.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in examining different methods to approach the problem, with some expressing uncertainty about the effects of their chosen reference frame. There is recognition of the need to clarify assumptions regarding angles and the relationships between them, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves specific angles and relationships that may not be straightforward, leading to confusion in calculations. The original poster's reference to a hint from a textbook introduces additional context that may influence their approach.

swevener
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A boy stands at the peak of a hill which slopes downward uniformly at angle ##\phi##. At what angle ##\theta## from the horizontal should he throw a rock so that it has the greatest range?

Homework Equations


##\mathbf{s} = \mathbf{v}_0 t + \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{a} t^2##

##\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{v}_0 + \mathbf{a} t##

The Attempt at a Solution


First I tilted the reference frame so the sloping hill is horizontal and the initial velocity is at an angle ##\theta + \phi## from the ground. This makes the acceleration ##\mathbf{a} = g \sin(\phi) \hat{\imath} - g \cos(\phi) \hat{\jmath}##. So position is given by
[tex]\mathbf{s} = \left[ v_0 t \cos(\theta + \phi) + \frac12 g t^2 \sin(\phi) \right] \hat{\imath} + \left[ v_0 t \sin(\theta + \phi) - \frac12 g t^2 \cos(\phi) \right] \hat{\jmath}.[/tex] Taking the derivative with respect to time,
[tex]\mathbf{v} = \left[ v_0 \cos(\theta + \phi) + g t \sin(\phi) \right] \hat{\imath} + \left[ v_0 \sin(\theta + \phi) - g t \cos(\phi) \right] \hat{\jmath}.[/tex]Setting the vertical component of velocity equal to zero gives half the total flight time:
[tex]t_{\text{max}} = \frac{v_0 \sin(\theta + \phi)}{g \cos(\theta)}.[/tex] Plugging ##2 t_{\text{max}}## into the horizontal component of ##\mathbf{s}## gives the distance traveled:
[tex]\begin{align}s_x (2 t_{\text{max}}) &= v_0 \frac{2 v_0 \sin(\theta + \phi)}{g \cos(\phi)} \cos(\theta + \phi) + \frac12 g \sin(\phi) \frac{4 v_0^2 \sin^2(\theta + \phi)}{\cos^2(\phi)} \\<br /> &= \frac{2 v_0^2}{g \cos(\phi)} [ \sin(\theta + \phi) \cos(\theta + \phi) + \sin^2(\theta + \phi) \tan(\phi) ].\end{align}[/tex]
To find the optimal ##\theta## for a given ##\phi##, take
[tex]\begin{align}\frac{\text{d}}{\text{d} \theta} s_x (2 t_{\text{max}}) = 0 &= \cos(\theta + \phi) \cos(\theta + \phi) - \sin(\theta + \phi) \sin(\theta + \phi) + 2 \sin(\theta + \phi) \cos(\theta + \phi) \tan(\phi) \\<br /> &= \cos^2(\theta + \phi) - \sin^2(\theta + \phi) + \sin(2(\theta + \phi)) \tan(\phi) \\<br /> &= \cos(2(\theta + \phi)) + \sin(2(\theta + \phi)) \tan(\phi).\end{align}[/tex] A bit of algebra gives
[tex]\tan(2(\theta + \phi)) = - \cot(\phi),[/tex] which results in an equation for ##\theta##
[tex]\theta = \frac12 \arctan(-\cot(\phi)) - \phi.[/tex]
Now, the book's hint was that when ##\phi## is 60º, ##\theta## should be 15º. My equation spits out -75º, which has the slight problem of meaning the boy would be throwing the rock through the hill. So my question is why am I off by 90º? Did I make a mistake in my math somewhere? Does it have to do with rotating my reference frame? :frown:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well -75 degrees seems suspiciously like 15 degrees

so your book says it slopes down at 60 degrees so should you be using -60 degrees?

I would try to solve it without the rotation to see if things work out.
 
Last edited:
It seems to me my equation should be spitting out 15º, not 15º - 90º.
 
jedishrfu said:
so your book says it slopes down at 60 degrees so should you be using -60 degrees?

I would try to solve it without the rotation to see if things work out.

Using -60º just gives me +75º. I've played with all the signs; the only answer that (sort of) works out is the one I got.

And solving the problem without the frame rotation is all kinds of unpleasant.
 
swevener said:
And solving the problem without the frame rotation is all kinds of unpleasant.
Not really.
Flight time t, hor dist x, vert dist y (measuring positive downwards), accn a, initial velocity u at θ above horizontal:
-ut sin(θ) + at2/2 = y = x tan(ϕ) = ut cos(θ)tan(ϕ)
at/2u = tan(ϕ)cos(θ) + sin(θ)
xa/u2 = 2tan(ϕ)cos2(θ) + 2 sin(θ)cos(θ) = tan(ϕ)(cos(2θ)+1) + sin(2θ)
For max x:
tan(ϕ)(-2sin(2θ)) + 2cos(2θ) = 0
tan(ϕ) = cot(2θ)
ϕ = π/2 - 2θ
 
haruspex said:
Not really.

Well, it was the way I was trying to do it, but if anything I've learned that I tend to overcomplicate things.

Anyway, I figured out the problem was my rotated frame. I plugged the ##2 t_{\text{max}}## I got above into the unrotated horizontal component of the distance equation and got the same equation haruspex did. Though I still don't know why rotating my frame an arbitrary angle offset my answer by exactly 90º.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K