MHB Throwing sandbags out of air balloon

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmaniac1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Balloon
AI Thread Summary
An air balloon descending with acceleration 'a' experiences an upward acceleration after a mass 'm' is dropped from it. The correct expression for 'm' in terms of the balloon's mass 'M' and acceleration 'a' is derived as m = 2Ma/(g+a). The discussion highlights confusion around the application of Newton's third law and the forces acting on the balloon before and after the mass is released. A detailed derivation clarifies that the thrust remains constant and the gravitational force decreases when the mass is dropped. This understanding resolves the initial confusion regarding the forces involved in the scenario.
mathmaniac1
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
An air balloon of mass M descending down with acceleration 'a'.A mass m is dropped out of it and the acceleration becomes a upwards.Find m in terms of M,a...

The right answer is 2Ma/(g+a)

The explanation I was given:
The mass out of the balloon now has a+g acceleration.
(How could it be when g was already a part of a?)
The 'action'=m(a+g)
Reaction=Change in force=2Ma-(-2Ma)=2Ma
2Ma=m(a+g)---->Newton's third law.
(Wait,final force=(M-m)a,why not?could it be that it was just ignored?)
(I don't get how they can be identified as action and reaction forces)
m=2Ma/(g+a)

Please help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's a derivation that you might find more intuitive (to be honest I also find the explanation given very poor and handwavy, even though it may be longer the proof below might help you see what's going on and why $g$ is taken into account).

First, assume that the engine which is imparting an acceleration to the balloon (i.e. helium lift or whatever) produces constant thrust upwards, denoted $F_\mathrm{thrust}$, and that the gravitational acceleration is downwards and is denoted $g$ (and is positive just for consistency with the question's sign conventions). The only assumption is that throwing the sandbag out does not change this thrust, which is reasonable and apparently correct (since sandbags generally do not interact with the engine, just dead weight).

Before the sandbag is released, the balloon has two forces acting on it, with a net force of:

$$F_i = F_\mathrm{thrust} - Mg$$

After the sandbag is released, the balloon still has the same thrust, but the gravitational force is less:

$$F_f = F_\mathrm{thrust} - (M - m)g$$

And so we know that the following holds:

$$F_\mathrm{thrust} = F_i + Mg = F_f + (M - m)g$$

But we also know from the question that $F_i = -Ma$, and $F_f = (M - m)a$. Substituting:

$$-Ma + Mg = (M - m)a + (M - m)g$$

$$M(g - a) = (M - m)(g + a)$$

And solving for $m$, the unknown mass:

$$M \frac{g - a}{g + a} = M - m$$

$$m = M - M \frac{g - a}{g + a} = M\left (1 - \frac{g - a}{g + a} \right ) = M \left ( \frac{g + a}{g + a} - \frac{g - a}{g + a} \right ) = M \left ( \frac{2a}{g + a} \right ) = \frac{2Ma}{g + a}$$

$$\blacksquare$$

(I'm actually shocked I got the derivation right so quickly, I'm usually crap at Newtonian physics. I guess playing KSP every now and then really does help :p).

 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top