Thrust force of a rocket ejecting mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the thrust force of a rocket that ejects mass at a certain rate, using the conservation of mass and momentum principles. The original poster seeks clarification on their approach to deriving the thrust force equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate momentum conservation to the thrust force equation but expresses uncertainty about their reasoning. Some participants question the conservation of momentum in the context of the rocket system and suggest considering the rocket and exhaust as a combined system. Others introduce the concept of impulse and its relation to force in the context of mass ejection.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and alternative perspectives on the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conservation laws and the implications of using different frames of reference. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the conversation is moving towards clarifying the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of conservation laws in non-constant mass systems and the implications of different inertial frames. The original poster is seeking help to ensure their understanding aligns with the principles of physics being discussed.

Emspak
Messages
240
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



OK, this seems simple but I want to make sure I am not doing something totally wrong. The problem says: use the conservation of mass of a system of many particles to shoe that the thrust force of a rocket that ejects mass at rate \frac{dm}{dt} is equal to F=-v_e \frac{dm}{dt} where v_e is the velocity of the mass ejected.


The Attempt at a Solution



I looked at it this way: momentum is conserved so if we start with mass m of the rocket, mv = k (where k is a constant).

SInce we have a simple differential equation F=-v_e \frac{dm}{dt} it can be integrated as -m v_e = Ft. Taking the derivative w/r/t time we get -m \frac {d v_e}{dt} = F

That gets us the F=ma part of the equation, showing that that works. But I notice that if momentum is a k (constant) then -m v_e = k = Ft.

There's a step I am missing here I think. I feel like I am almost there. Any hep -- and anyone telling me I have approached this in entirely the wrong way -- would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The momentum of the rocket is *not* a conserved quantity. What you are missing is that to look at things from the perspective of conservation of momentum you need to look at the rocket+exhaust cloud system.

Another issue is how you look at force. There is a direct connection with the conservation laws if you use ##\vec F=d(m\vec v)/dt##. However, this means force is a frame-dependent quantity if mass is not constant. Force becomes frame invariant if you use ##\vec F = m\vec a##, but now the immediate connection with the conservation laws is lost.

It might help if you look at things from the perspective of an inertial frame that is co-moving with the rocket (i.e., an inertial frame in which the rocket's instantaneous velocity is zero). The F=dp/dt versus F=ma imbroglio vanishes with this choice.
 
A very simple version, alon DH's reasoning, is the following:

Let us move along with the rocket through a tiny time Dt, in which a little mass Dm has been ejected with a velocity, relative to the rocket, v_e.

That little packet of mass has expreniced a momentum change, what we call an impulse, of Dmv_e

Impulse equals Dt*F, so the little packet of mass experienced the force:

F=v_e*Dm/Dt.

Now, by Newton's 3 law, you'll get the result for the thrust force for the rocket!
---
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks to you both. I felt like this was a much simpler problem than it looked...
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K