MHB TikZ Challenge 1 - Geometrical Diagram - Votes

AI Thread Summary
A challenge was held to create impressive geometrical diagrams using TikZ, with voting open for two weeks. Participants submitted various diagrams showcasing different mathematical concepts, including triangles, direction fields, and trigonometric foundations. The voting concluded with 15 participants, and the results announced MarkFL as the winner, followed by Serena, lfdahl, and greg1313. The thread celebrated all contributors for their efforts and creativity in the challenge. The discussion has now been closed.

What is the best TikZ contribution for a geometrical diagram?


  • Total voters
    15
  • Poll closed .
I like Serena
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
MHB
Messages
16,335
Reaction score
258
Hey all,

2 weeks ago I created a challenge to create a geometrical diagram, like a triangle, that is somehow interesting or impressive.
Now the moment of truth is here. Please everyone, give your vote!
Voting will close in 2 weeks time.

Let me recap the submissions.I like Serena

\begin{tikzpicture}[blue]
\coordinate (A) at (0,0);
\coordinate (B) at (4,0);
\coordinate (C) at (4,3);
\draw[blue, ultra thick] (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- cycle;
\path (A) node[below left] {A} -- (B) node[below right] {B} -- (C) node[above] {C};
\path (A) -- node[below] {c} (B) -- node
{a} (C) -- node[above left] {b} (A);
\path (A) node[above right, xshift=12] {$\alpha$};
\draw[thick] (B) rectangle +(-0.4,0.4);
\draw[thick] (A) +(1,0) arc (0:atan(3/4):1);
\end{tikzpicture}
[latexs]
\begin{tikzpicture}[blue]
\coordinate (A) at (0,0);
\coordinate (B) at (4,0);
\coordinate (C) at (4,3);
\draw[blue, ultra thick] (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- cycle;
\path (A) node[below left] {A} -- (B) node[below right] {B} -- (C) node[above] {C};
\path (A) -- node[below] {c} (B) -- node
{a} (C) -- node[above left] {b} (A);
\path (A) node[above right, xshift=12] {$\alpha$};
\draw[thick] (B) rectangle +(-0.4,0.4);
\draw[thick] (A) +(1,0) arc (0:atan(3/4):1);
\end{tikzpicture}
[/latexs]
This picture is special because it's a basic shape that showcases:
  1. Naming coordinates.
  2. Drawing a closed polygon.
  3. Embellishing with properties (for color and thickness).
  4. Adding labels next to nodes and next to lines.
  5. Specifying relative coordinates.
  6. Drawing an arc.
  7. Using a mathematical function (for the angle of the arc).
greg1313

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2]
\usetikzlibrary{calc}
\coordinate (A) at (0,0);
\coordinate (B) at (1,2.5);
\coordinate (C) at (4,0);
\draw (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- cycle;
\draw (B) -- ($(A)!(B)!(C)$) ++(90:0.2) -- ++(0:0.2) -- +(-90:0.2);
\draw (A) -- ($(B)!(A)!(C)$) ++(-39.806:0.2) -- ++(50.194:-0.2) -- +(-39.806:-0.2);
\draw (C) -- ($(A)!(C)!(B)$) ++(68.2:-0.2) -- ++(-21.8:0.2) -- +(68.2:0.2);
\draw (A) node
{$A$} -- (B) node[above]{$B$}node[midway,above]{$c\quad$} -- (C)node
{$C$}node[midway,above]{$\quad a$} -- (A)node[midway,below]{$b$};
\node[align=center,font=\bfseries, yshift=2em] (title)
at (current bounding box.north)
{An illustration of the altitudes of a triangle, \\ intersecting at a single point called the orthocenter};
\end{tikzpicture}
[latexs]
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2]
\usetikzlibrary{calc}
\coordinate (A) at (0,0);
\coordinate (B) at (1,2.5);
\coordinate (C) at (4,0);
\draw (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- cycle;
\draw (B) -- ($(A)!(B)!(C)$) ++(90:0.2) -- ++(0:0.2) -- +(-90:0.2);
\draw (A) -- ($(B)!(A)!(C)$) ++(-39.806:0.2) -- ++(50.194:-0.2) -- +(-39.806:-0.2);
\draw (C) -- ($(A)!(C)!(B)$) ++(68.2:-0.2) -- ++(-21.8:0.2) -- +(68.2:0.2);
\draw (A) node
{$A$} -- (B) node[above]{$B$}node[midway,above]{$c\quad$} -- (C)node
{$C$}node[midway,above]{$\quad a$} -- (A)node[midway,below]{$b$};
\node[align=center,font=\bfseries, yshift=2em] (title)
at (current bounding box.north)
{An illustration of the altitudes of a triangle, \\ intersecting at a single point called the orthocenter};
\end{tikzpicture}
[/latexs]
This TikZ diagram includes a title.MarkFL

\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[<->][red] (-5.5,0) -- (5.5,0) node
{$x$};
\draw[<->][red] (0,-5.5) -- (0,5.5) node[above] {$y$};
\foreach \x in {-5,-4.5,...,-0.5,0.5,1,...,5}
{
\foreach \y in {-5,-4.5,...,-0.5,0.5,1,...,5}
{
\def \angle {atan((3*\x*\y)/(2*(\x)^2-(\y)^2))};
\draw[thick,blue] ({\x + 0.1*cos(\angle)},{\y + 0.1*sin(\angle)}) -- ({\x + 0.1*cos(\angle + 180)},{\y + 0.1*sin(\angle + 180)});
}
}
\end{tikzpicture}
[latexs]
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[<->][red] (-5.5,0) -- (5.5,0) node
{$x$};
\draw[<->][red] (0,-5.5) -- (0,5.5) node[above] {$y$};
\foreach \x in {-5,-4.5,...,-0.5,0.5,1,...,5}
{
\foreach \y in {-5,-4.5,...,-0.5,0.5,1,...,5}
{
\def \angle {atan((3*\x*\y)/(2*(\x)^2-(\y)^2))};
\draw[thick,blue] ({\x + 0.1*cos(\angle)},{\y + 0.1*sin(\angle)}) -- ({\x + 0.1*cos(\angle + 180)},{\y + 0.1*sin(\angle + 180)});
}
}
\end{tikzpicture}
[/latexs]
This TikZ diagram illustrates a direction field for a magnetic dipole, and utilizes the following:
  • Nodes for the axis labels.
  • Nested foreach loops.
  • The definition of an angle (slope) based on coordinates.
  • Parametric values for the endpoints of line segments.
lfdahl

[TIKZ][scale=3]
\draw[step=.5cm, gray, very thin] (-1.2,-1.2) grid (1.2,1.2);
\filldraw[fill=green!20,draw=green!50!black] (0,0) -- (3mm,0mm) arc (0:30:3mm) -- cycle;
\draw[->] (-1.25,0) -- (1.25,0) coordinate (x axis);
\draw[->] (0,-1.25) -- (0,1.25) coordinate (y axis);
\draw (0,0) circle (1cm);
\draw[very thick,red] (30:1cm) -- node[left,fill=white] {$\sin \alpha$} (30:1cm |- x axis);
\draw[very thick,blue] (30:1cm |- x axis) -- node[below=2pt,fill=white] {$\cos \alpha$} (0,0);
\draw (0,0) -- (30:1cm);
\foreach \x/\xtext in {-1, -0.5/-\frac{1}{2}, 1}
\draw (\x cm,1pt) -- (\x cm,-1pt) node[anchor=north,fill=white] {$\xtext$};
\foreach \y/\ytext in {-1, -0.5/-\frac{1}{2}, 0.5/\frac{1}{2}, 1}
\draw (1pt,\y cm) -- (-1pt,\y cm) node[anchor=east,fill=white] {$\ytext$};
[/TIKZ]
[latexs]
[TIKZ][scale=3]
\draw[step=.5cm, gray, very thin] (-1.2,-1.2) grid (1.2,1.2);
\filldraw[fill=green!20,draw=green!50!black] (0,0) -- (3mm,0mm) arc (0:30:3mm) -- cycle;
\draw[->] (-1.25,0) -- (1.25,0) coordinate (x axis);
\draw[->] (0,-1.25) -- (0,1.25) coordinate (y axis);
\draw (0,0) circle (1cm);
\draw[very thick,red] (30:1cm) -- node[left,fill=white] {$\sin \alpha$} (30:1cm |- x axis);
\draw[very thick,blue] (30:1cm |- x axis) -- node[below=2pt,fill=white] {$\cos \alpha$} (0,0);
\draw (0,0) -- (30:1cm);
\foreach \x/\xtext in {-1, -0.5/-\frac{1}{2}, 1}
\draw (\x cm,1pt) -- (\x cm,-1pt) node[anchor=north,fill=white] {$\xtext$};
\foreach \y/\ytext in {-1, -0.5/-\frac{1}{2}, 0.5/\frac{1}{2}, 1}
\draw (1pt,\y cm) -- (-1pt,\y cm) node[anchor=east,fill=white] {$\ytext$};
[/TIKZ]
[/latexs]
This TikZ picture is special, because it demonstrates:
- The very foundation of trigonometry
- Construction of a coordinate system
- Construction of a grid
- Coloring of line segments
- The making of tick labels
- How to fill in with colors
- How to use different line thickness
- How to position labels​
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Voting is over.
Thank you all for taking the time to take a look and vote. We have 15 voters!
The result:
  1. MarkFL
  2. I like Serena
  3. lfdahl
  4. greg1313
A big hurray for every one of the contributors. Thank you for your efforts!

Thread closed.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top