MHB Tilting a circle or ring over backwards creates an ellipse....

Pogster
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What I would like to be able to calculate is the following:

Suppose a hoop or ring is held up perpendicular to the ground and you stood in front of it, it would look perfectly circular and knowing the radius you could calculate the area of this circle. Now if this hoop was tilted over backwards it would look elliptical to you the observer. I need to be able to calculate the area of the resulting ellipses for any angle of tilt of my hoop.

Would the following be correct: The horizontal axis length of all the ellipses that result from tilting my hoop over are going to be the same as that of the original circle but the vertical axis is going to get progressively less. Can I therefore ignore the horizontal axis and treat the vertical axis as a pole falling over backwards and as it falls it's height decreases by: (original height) x sin (tilt angle). Which means for different tilt angles I can calculate the minor axis and with this value and the constant major axis length calculate the area of the resulting ellipses?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, Pogster! (Wave)

I agree with your reasoning, except I think we need to use:

(original height)·|sin (tilt angle)|

to avoid negative values when the tilt angle might be in the 3rd or 4th quadrants. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top