Time as Dimension: Before & After Einstein's G.T.R.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karkas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of time as a dimension, particularly in the context of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (G.T.R.) and its historical precedents. Participants explore the implications of defining time as a dimension and its utility in various frameworks, including graphical representations and transformations in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question when time was first considered a dimension, specifically whether this notion emerged after Einstein's G.T.R. or existed prior.
  • Others argue that diagrams incorporating time as a dimension were used before Einstein and Minkowski, suggesting that the utility of treating time as a dimension is not exclusive to G.T.R.
  • A participant discusses the definitions of "dimension" and "vector," proposing that these concepts help avoid mixing units and facilitate the definition of transformations between dimensions.
  • Another participant raises a question about the definition of "dimension," particularly whether using time or any physical quantity as a vector component qualifies it as a dimension.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the historical context of time as a dimension and the definitions of related concepts, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of "dimension" and "vector," as well as the dependence on historical context and interpretations of physical quantities in different frameworks.

karkas
Messages
131
Reaction score
1
Since when is Time considered to be a dimension?

Is it after Einstein's G.T.R. or was it considered to be one before it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karkas said:
Since when is Time considered to be a dimension?

Is it after Einstein's G.T.R. or was it considered to be one before it?

People have used diagrams with time as a dimension long before Einstein/Minkowski. For example in order to visualize movement with a static diagram. There is nothing special about considering a physical quantity to be a dimension. But in GR it proves very useful.
 
The concept of "dimension" and "vector" is just a way for us to keep from mixing different units and also to more easily define any transforms of conserved quantities that there might be between those dimensions, if any. For example, in a Euclidean space, transforms preserve distance. Also, one can imagine spaces in which the transforms are different depending on the particular dimensions involved.
 
Last edited:
Well ... first of all .. what is "dimension"? Whenever you use time or any other physical quantity as the component of some vector (including space components), is it enough to consider it as a dimension ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K