Time dependent Resistance in an RC-circuit

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 5K views
gonzalesdp
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You have an RC-circuit with emf E, resistance R, and Capacitance C. However, R = R(t) = R_o(t/tao+1)^-1, where R_o is the intitial resistance. Assume that other than the time-dependent resistance, the circuit behaves normally.

Homework Equations



Show that during discharge the charfe at time t is given by

q(t) = q_oe^{-t(t/2tao+1)/R_oC} where q_o is the initial charge on the capacitor.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know to find q(t) of a simple RC-circuit you need to use basic differential equations. (a course which I have not taken yet). I've tried to simply substitue R(t) for R in the equation

q(t) = q_oe^(-S dt/RC)
(the "S" is the great s for integration, I'm not sure how it should be notated.)

This isn't working though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gonzalesdp said:
I know to find q(t) of a simple RC-circuit you need to use basic differential equations. (a course which I have not taken yet). I've tried to simply substitue R(t) for R in the equation

q(t) = q_oe^(-S dt/RC)
(the "S" is the great s for integration, I'm not sure how it should be notated.)

If you did not learn how to solve a differential equation, do the opposite thing: show that the given q(t) function yields the same voltage across the capacitor (Q/C) and the resistor (IR). I hope you have learned to differentiate and you know that I=-dQ/dt in case of discharge. (The magnitude of charge removed from the capacitor in unit time (dQ/dt) is equal to the charge flowing through the loop in unit time (that is the current I). ehild
 
Thanks Sammy. I'll work on it a little more with your suggestions.

Thanks ehild. I don't know why but when I worked it out on my paper, I didn't realize the t/tao. I keep using t/(tao + 1). Such a dumb move on my part. Thanks again.
 
Yup it worked out. It's amazing that I worked on that problem for hours without realizing I wrote it down wrong to begin with. Thanks SammyS and ehild.
 
I'm still going to try it your way SammyS. I'd like to see how it unfolds that way. It's always good to know another way to solve a problem.