Time dilation formula explanation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the time dilation formula in the context of special relativity. Participants are exploring the derivation and implications of the formula, as well as the foundational concepts that lead to its formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the components of the time dilation formula and seeks clarification on its derivation. Some participants reference the Pythagorean theorem as a basis for understanding the formula. Questions arise regarding the constancy of the speed of light and how it relates to different observers moving at various velocities.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, offering insights and references to external resources. There is an ongoing exploration of assumptions related to the speed of light and how it is perceived by different observers. Multiple interpretations of the implications of these concepts are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the original poster may not be familiar with the principles of relativity, which could influence their understanding of the discussion. The conversation also touches on the differences between everyday experiences of speed and the relativistic effects described by the theory.

Phycisists
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain how the time dilation formula works?

T=t/(√(1-v^2)/c^2))...

... What does the 1 stand for? Why include it?

Can you write down the process of the formula?... How does ((C*t)^2))/c^2-v^2
lead to the time dilation formula? Please explain the process.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It comes from pythagoreans theorem. I'd have to go through and try to set it up and solve it again.

Basically you need to have some observer which you use as the rest frame, then you need some observer moving at a velocity v_0 relative to the stationary observer. You then have them observe the same photon.

The most important thing that, at least for me, wasn't all that intuitive at first, you have to assume that no matter how fast or slow an observer is moving, via ideal experimental trials, if they measure the speed of a photon, it will always be c.

That should be enough info to get you started on deriving the formula for time dialation.
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
It comes from pythagoreans theorem. I'd have to go through and try to set it up and solve it again.

Basically you need to have some observer which you use as the rest frame, then you need some observer moving at a velocity v_0 relative to the stationary observer. You then have them observe the same photon.

The most important thing that, at least for me, wasn't all that intuitive at first, you have to assume that no matter how fast or slow an observer is moving, via ideal experimental trials, if they measure the speed of a photon, it will always be c.

That should be enough info to get you started on deriving the formula for time dialation.

So if I'm moving relative to the speed of light (e.g 3*10^5 m/s), does that mean that the speed of light still will be moving faster than me, NOT have the speed v=0 relative to me, or just stay C? :confused:
 
One of the basic assumptions in special relativity is that light will always move at speed c relative to any observer. This means that no matter what your velocity is relative to a light source, you will always see the light moving with this speed.
 
Say you're moving parallel in line with a photon, but you're moving at .5c, the photon is obviously moving at c, but, contrary to say 2 cars moving down the road, if you could somehow measure the speed of that photon, you would still measure c, not .5 c like expected.
 
Phycisists said:
So if I'm moving relative to the speed of light (e.g 3*10^5 m/s), does that mean that the speed of light still will be moving faster than me, NOT have the speed v=0 relative to me, or just stay C? :confused:

It will just stay C.

If you move 99% C in the same direction as a photon, you would expect it to only seem to be moving 1% C, right? The fundamental assumption of Relativity is that you actually see the photon moving at 100% C, not 1% C like expected.
 
I would not use the expression "as expected" in this context. Anyone familiar with relativity will expect the photon to move with speed c ... If just going by everyday experience we do not know what to expect since the speed of light is so far removed from this that c is practically infinite for most phenomena that occur in our everyday lives.
 
I see your point Orodruin, but to the average observer who is NOT familiar with relativity, as I'm assuming the op isn't, would expect velocities to sum non relativistically, such as my car metaphor.

If I'm doing 45 mph behind a car doing 55 mph, they're moving 10mph w.r.t. me; whereas if the car were a photon it would still move at c w.r.t. me, not (c-45mph). That's what I mean by as expected. If my wording caused any confusion, I apologize.
 
  • #10
Wait... in that case, isn't the speed of light infinite as it never changes?
 
  • #11
No, the speed of light is finite, 299792458 m/s. The fact that any observer will see the same light speed regardless of how the observer moves is one of the foundations of relativity and ultimately leads to the fact that space and time cannot be considered independent.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
915
Replies
8
Views
946
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K