Time it takes to achieve terminal velocity?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 100 kg skydiver and their terminal velocity of 58 m/s, with a focus on the time it takes to reach that speed given a specific air resistance equation. The context includes concepts from dynamics and differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore Newton's second law and its application to the problem, questioning how to set up the differential equation for velocity over time. Some participants attempt integration to find the time to reach terminal velocity, while others express uncertainty about the calculus involved.

Discussion Status

There is a range of approaches being discussed, including integration and the implications of terminal velocity. Some participants provide guidance on setting up equations, while others express confusion about the integration process and the assumptions involved. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the relationship between terminal velocity and the time to reach it.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the terminal velocity given (58 m/s) does not match the calculated terminal velocity based on the provided parameters, leading to confusion about the expected outcome. There is also mention of the teacher's intent in framing the question to assess understanding of terminal velocity concepts.

mcovalt
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 100kg skydiver has a terminal velocity of 58 m/s. Assuming air resistance of the skydiver is Fair=.3(v)2, how long will it take the skydiver to reach 58 m/s?

gravity is 10 m/s2 in our class btw.

Homework Equations


Fair=.3(v)2
Fg=mg

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the air resistance force will end up equaling 1000N at 58 m/s. I just don't know how long that will take.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write up Newton's second law, solve it for v(t) and see if 58 m/s will be ever reached.

ehild
 
Last edited:
I integrated to find the answer, which lead to about 17.55 seconds.
 
ehild said:
Write up Newton's second law, solve it for v(t) and see if 58 m/s will be ever reached.

ehild
I'm sorry, I am not in calculus based physics so excuse the ignorance :) Sound's like a differential equation. Newton's second is F=m * dv/dt. If this is a differential, how do I set this up to calculate via Wolframalpha?
 
Theorγ said:
I integrated to find the answer, which lead to about 17.55 seconds.

How would one go about integrating it?
 
Set up the sum of forces:
\Sigma F = F_{g} - F_{A}
\Sigma F = (100 kg)(10 \frac{m}{s^{2}}) - 0.3v^2
ma= (100 kg)(10 \frac{m}{s^{2}}) - 0.3v^2
a= \frac{(100 kg)(10 \frac{m}{s^{2}}) - 0.3v^2}{m}
\frac{dv}{dt}= 10 \frac{m}{s^{2}} - 0.003v^2
\frac{dv}{10 \frac{m}{s^{2}} - 0.003v^2}= dt
\int\frac{dv}{10 \frac{m}{s^{2}} - 0.003v^2}= \int dt
 
Thank you so much! this helps greatly!
 
I assume you are able to solve separable differential equations right?
 
Well, no. But you got me to a place where I can start learning.
 
  • #11
Alright. I completely understand the math thanks to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNHlSB6b1HU".

But I have one more q before I call it a day. How exactly did integrating give us the answer in seconds?

Let me guess and tell me how wrong I am: by getting F=ma down to an acceleration equation we found the integral of the acceleration equation to get the velocity equation. We were able to do this by getting the v's on one side and the t's on the other. Once we integrated both sides we found the velocity equation. Solving the equation for v=(58) we found that t=17.5498 seconds.

Correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Theorγ said:
Set up the sum of forces:
\Sigma F = F_{g} - F_{A}
\Sigma F = (100 kg)(10 \frac{m}{s^{2}}) - 0.3v^2
ma= (100 kg)(10 \frac{m}{s^{2}}) - 0.3v^2
a= \frac{(100 kg)(10 \frac{m}{s^{2}}) - 0.3v^2}{m}
\frac{dv}{dt}= 10 \frac{m}{s^{2}} - 0.003v^2
\frac{dv}{10 \frac{m}{s^{2}} - 0.003v^2}= dt
\int\frac{dv}{10 \frac{m}{s^{2}} - 0.003v^2}= \int dt

It does not make sense to write an integral such as
<br /> \displaystyle<br /> \int\frac{dv}{10 \frac{m}{s^{2}} - 0.003v^2}= \int dt.
If you gave this to a computer algebra package, it would assume that "m" and "s" are some constants, and would give you an answer involving them in an incorrect way. For example, Maple gives the integral as
<br /> \displaystyle<br /> \frac{5.773502692\, s \, \mbox{ arctanh}( \frac{.01732050808 s v}{\sqrt{m}} )}{\sqrt{m}}<br />

You need to remove the "units" inside the integral---after all, you don't have any units in the "0.003 v^2" or in the "dv" parts.

RGV
 
  • #13
Whops my bad, Vickson is right about removing the units, although I only placed them there initially so you would know where those numbers came from. The solution of the left integral would just actually come from partial fractions method though.
 
  • #14
I understood about the values, but thanks for the heads up!

I finished my paper and I was wondering, if you all had the time, to look at page 3 and the bottom of page 5 to make sure I properly explained the integration aspect.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B4NW_8WLoKvwMmViMzFkOWYtNTM3NS00ZmU0LWI5OTgtYzk5ZDIwYWQyYTM5&hl=en_US&authkey=CNLHqaMP
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
Theorγ said:
I integrated to find the answer, which lead to about 17.55 seconds.

If the terminal velocity is 58 m/s then it takes infinite time to reach it. And of course infinite distance. But of course the diver would hit the ground first.

If you do the integrations in post 6 you will get tterminal = tanh-1(1)/√(cg) = ∞
where c = 0.003 according to post 6.
 
  • #17
mcovalt said:
I understood about the values, but thanks for the heads up!

I finished my paper and I was wondering, if you all had the time, to look at page 3 and the bottom of page 5 to make sure I properly explained the integration aspect.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B4NW_8WLoKvwMmViMzFkOWYtNTM3NS00ZmU0LWI5OTgtYzk5ZDIwYWQyYTM5&hl=en_US&authkey=CNLHqaMP

Link won't open.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
ehild said:
. . . we found that t=17.5498 seconds.

Correct?

Well, one person got that answer, and rude man has posted a quite different answer.
 
  • #19
Terminal velocity means the velocity at the end of time and time never ends... More precisely terminal velocity is the limit of velocity when the time goes to infinity. It is a constant, when the acceleration is zero, that is, when the forces - gravity and air drag balance each other.

In this problem, ∑F=mg-kv2, and it is zero when v2=mg/k=1000/0.3, that is v_∞=\sqrt{mg/k}=57.74 m/s, not 58 m/s. If the skydriver's initial speed is zero, its speed will increase and tends to v. If the initial speed is greater than that, it will slow down and the speed tends to vagain. If it happens to travel with the initial speed it will be unchanged.

Solving the differential equation, you get \ \ln|\frac{v_∞+v}{v_∞-v}|-\ln|\frac{v_∞+v_0}{v_∞-v_0}|=\frac{2gt}{v_∞}, (v0 is the initial velocity), that is\frac{(v_∞+v)(v_∞-v_0)}{(v_∞-v)(v_∞+v_0)}=e^{2gt/v_∞}

As the exponential function on the right side is never negative, v_∞-v has the same sign as v_∞-v_0. If the initial speed is less than the terminal speed, the speed can never exceed the terminal speed.
ehild
 
  • #20
Or simply

t = (v/g)tanh-1(v/v) and

v = (v)tanh(gt/v).

Assuming initial v = 0.
 
  • #21
It's possible the teacher wanted to see if students know, conceptually, that the velocity approaches the terminal value without ever reaching it.
 
  • #22
Sure, the intention of the teacher was to see if the students knew what terminal velocity was... He gave the terminal velocity (58 m/s) and asked when would be the speed equal to 58 m/s. But the thread went aside by performing the integration (although it was useful for the OP). As the terminal velocity v(terminal)= sqrt(mg/k) was not the given value (58 m/s), integration gave a finite time by substituting v=58 m/s but keeping v(terminal)= sqrt(mg/k) although v was greater than that. That confused a few people posting to the thread.

ehild
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
874
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K