Time it takes to swim across a river

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexsphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    River Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a swimmer to cross a river while countering the current. Participants clarify that the swimmer must aim upstream at an angle to cancel the current's effect, rather than swimming directly across. The correct approach involves using the swimmer's speed and the river's current to determine the resultant velocity, which is not a simple triangle calculation. The textbook's provided time of 624.3 seconds is debated, with some suggesting it may be inaccurate based on the swimmer's actual speed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding vector components in this scenario to arrive at the correct answer.
alexsphysics
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A man wishes to swim across a river 600m wide. If he can swim at the rate of 4 km/h in still water and the river flows at 2 km/h, when will he reach it?
Relevant Equations
My textbook says the answer is 624.3s, but I don't see how that is.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume the swimmer must swim directly across to the other side.
 
Please show how you calculated the time and got a different answer.
 
Doc Al said:
Please show how you calculated the time and got a different answer.
Well at first I imagined a man swimming across a river, then I imagined the current pulling him downwards, and so I made a triangle and tried to solve for the hypotenuse, proceeding by trying to use t=d/v, but then I realized that it shouldn't be a triangle at all because the problem states that he should arrive at the point EXACTLY opposite from the starting point. (Which I didn't write in the problem, my mistake) And now I'm not sure how to go about it
 
What direction must the swimmer aim in order to counter the current taking him downstream?

alexsphysics said:
so I made a triangle and tried to solve for the hypotenuse
Drawing a triangle is the right thing to do. But realize that the swimmer's speed is the hypotenuse.
 
  • Informative
Likes alexsphysics
He should be swimming upwards to counter.
 
To clarify: when you say upwards, do you mean what I would call upstream (edit: or upriver)?
 
alexsphysics said:
He should be swimming upwards to counter.
Exactly. He needs to swim at an angle (with respect to the moving water) so that the component of his velocity parallel to the river cancels the current.
 
  • Like
Likes alexsphysics
sojsail said:
To clarify: when you say upwards, do you mean what I would call upstream (edit: or upriver)?
yep
 
  • #10
OK, please let us know if Doc Al's last post has helped you see how to make progress on this.
 
  • #11
alexsphysics said:
Relevant Equations: My textbook says the answer is 624.3s, but I don't see how that is.

Me, either.

The textbook answer is way off if he just points himself directly at the far bank and starts swimming.

It's much closer if - as it seems - he wants to end up on the riverbank, directly across ; however it's off enough to think the textbook is playing pretty fast and loose with significant number of decimals in the calculations.
 
  • Informative
Likes alexsphysics
  • #12
hmmm27 said:
Me, either.

The textbook answer is way off if he just points himself directly at the far bank and starts swimming.

It's much closer if - as it seems - he wants to end up on the riverbank, directly across ; however it's off enough to think the textbook is playing pretty fast and loose with significant number of decimals in the calculations.
University Physics screws with me sometimes :l What was your answer?
 
  • #13
Yes, there is an error somewhere. Before we knew that the goal was to go straight across the river, I worked it out assuming all of his speed would be dedicated to getting across the river quickly. That would yield the minimum time considering his speed and width of the river. That time was 1080 seconds. The book's time is about 1/2 of that. For him to set a course to get him straight across from the starting point forces him to spend some of his speed on the task of cancelling the current instead of getting across the river.

But, the purpose of this question was for you to exercise your skills. You should work on finding the correct time (Edit: actual correct time) to get to the point straight across the river. Keep us up to date on how you are doing and we will make certain that you have it right.
 
  • Like
Likes alexsphysics
  • #14
Here is a nudge: Review Doc Al's post #8.
 
  • #15
sojsail said:
Yes, there is an error somewhere. Before we knew that the goal was to go straight across the river, I worked it out assuming all of his speed would be dedicated to getting across the river quickly. That would yield the minimum time considering his speed and width of the river. That time was 1080 seconds. The book's time is about 1/2 of that. For him to set a course to get him straight across from the starting point forces him to spend some of his speed on the task of cancelling the current instead of getting across the river.

But, the purpose of this question was for you to exercise your skills. You should work on finding the correct time to get to the point straight across the river. Keep us up to date on how you are doing and we will make certain that you have it right.
I tried drawing a triangle and solving for the hypotenuse, proceeding by trying to use t=d/v. Where am I going wrong?
 
  • #16
OK, please describe your triangle.
 
  • #17
sojsail said:
OK, please describe your triangle.
The vertical side was labeled with the speed that the river was carrying the water, and the horizontal was labeled with the speed that the man was swimming
 
  • #18
Doc Al said
Exactly. He needs to swim at an angle (with respect to the moving water) so that the component of his velocity parallel to the river cancels the current.
Doc Al's "at an angle" means not perpendicular. Your vertical and horizontal sides would be perpendicular, would they not?
 
  • #19
I need to sign off for tonight. I hope someone else will take up monitoring and aiding your progress.
 
  • #20
sojsail said:
That would yield the minimum time considering his speed and width of the river. That time was 1080 seconds.
It would, but (600 m)/(4 km/h) = 540 s. The swimmer’s speed relative to the river is 4 kph, not 2 kph.

alexsphysics said:
He should be swimming upwards to counter.
alexsphysics said:
The vertical side was labeled with the speed that the river was carrying the water, and the horizontal was labeled with the speed that the man was swimming
This is not correct. It describes the situation where the swimmer just wants to get to the other side.
 
  • #21
The swimmer’s speed relative to the river is 4 kph, not 2 kph.

I am back. I see that Orodruin caught me misreading the problem. He swims at 4 kph, so the minimum time to the opposite shore would be 540 s. So the book's 624.3 s may be right Edit: since the landing point is to be exactly opposite.

Picture yourself at the bank of the river about to jump in and swim. You see the current and know that it will carry you with it. There are 2 velocity vectors involved. (For discussion, let's assume the river flows south and you need to go across from west to east.) In the reference system of dry land, what direction should you aim your 4 kph in order to arrive at the point straight across? Now, as you think about that, does the way you drew your triangle (with your 4 kph perpendicular to the river's 2 kph) seem right?
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Textbook answer indicates rounding of the Pythagoras calculation before doing the t = s/v calculation. If you don't round it should be 623.54 s.
 
  • #23
neilparker62 said:
Textbook answer indicates rounding of the Pythagoras calculation before doing the t = s/v calculation. If you don't round it should be 623.54 s.
So now, we just got to wait for the OP to reverse-engineer how to get there. He does seem to be stuck on ##a^2+b^2=c^2## being the only way to order that equation.
 
Back
Top