Time of collision of two lead spheres

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two uniform lead spheres, each with a mass of 5000 kg and a radius of 47 cm, released from rest 1 meter apart, moving under their mutual gravitational attraction. The objective is to demonstrate that they will collide in less than 425 seconds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the gravitational force acting on the spheres and the implications of using constant acceleration to estimate collision time. There are attempts to derive the time analytically through differential equations and integrals.
  • Some participants question the limits of integration and the assumptions made regarding the motion of the spheres, particularly concerning the energy conservation approach.
  • Concerns are raised about the interpretation of the signs in the equations, especially regarding the direction of motion as the spheres approach each other.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on the correct application of energy conservation principles and the implications of the signs in the equations. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive dialogue continues regarding the calculations and assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the initial distance between the centers of the spheres is 1 meter, and they discuss the significance of the spheres touching when their centers are 94 cm apart, which corresponds to their combined radii. The analysis is constrained by the need to adhere to homework guidelines and the requirement to show that the collision occurs in less than 425 seconds.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87

Homework Statement


Two uniform lead spheres each have mass 5000kg and radius 47cm. They are released from rest with their centres 1m apart and move under their mutual gravitational attraction. Show that they will collide in less than 425s.

Homework Equations


By Gauss' Law, force on a sphere exerted by the other is ##F = - m^2 G/R^2##.

The Attempt at a Solution


The acceleration of the spheres as they approach each other increases as an inverse power of R. To get an upper bound of the collision time, assume constant acceleration throughout and use standard kinematical equations. This gave me the solution. I'm interested in solving for the time more analytically by solving a DE.

The spheres approach each other in a straight line so force on one from other is $$F = - \frac{m^2 G}{R^2} = m \frac{dv}{dt} \Rightarrow - \frac{m G}{R^2} = \frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{dv}{dR}v$$ Solving for v gives $$ \frac{1}{2} v^2 = mG \left(\frac{1}{R} - \frac{1}{R_0}\right)$$ where at ##R_0## the configuration is at rest. Then $$\frac{dR}{dt} = \sqrt{2mG} \sqrt{ \frac{R_0-R}{RR_0}}$$ so need to then solve $$\sqrt{R_0} \int_{R_0}^R \frac{\sqrt{R'}}{\sqrt{R_0-R'}} dR' = \sqrt{2mG} \int_0^T dt$$ where T is the collision time. The integral on lhs can be solved by ##R' = R_0 \sin^2 \theta## where ##R_0 = 0.06 m## and ##R=0.03m##. (The system will collide at the CoM) . For these values of R and R_0, and choosing the integration range to be ##[-\pi/2, -0.253], | \sin \theta| = - \sin \theta## and ##|\cos \theta| = \cos \theta##. This gives $$T \approx -1.12 \frac{1}{\sqrt{mG}}$$ while in the solution assuming constant acceleration it was $$T \approx 0.245 \frac{1}{\sqrt{mG}}$$ so the numbers are off in my analysis.

Thanks for any pointers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CAF123 said:
Two uniform lead spheres each have mass 5000kg and radius 47cm. They are released from rest with their centres 1m apart and move under their mutual gravitational attraction. Show that they will collide in less than 425s.

i was wondering about limits of R as initially the centres are one meter apart?
one can take the grav. pull keeping the mass at the centre as equivalent positions!
no doubt the collision will take place as the spheres will touch each other i.e. when the centers are at 2 times the radius...
 
CAF123 said:
The integral on lhs can be solved by ##R' = R_0 \sin^2 \theta##
Right, but you have not shown your steps after that, so we cannot see where you go wrong.
 
Are you sure about the 1/2 on the left side of the equation where you solve for v? If you view this as essentially an energy conservation equation with the change in kinetic energy on the left and the change in potential energy on the right, the 1/2 assumes that only one sphere moves instead of both.
 
CAF123 said:
Then $$\frac{dR}{dt} = \sqrt{2mG} \sqrt{ \frac{R_0-R}{RR_0}}$$
What do you think is wrong with this equation?
 
haruspex said:
Right, but you have not shown your steps after that, so we cannot see where you go wrong.
$$ \sqrt{R_0} \int_{R_0}^R \frac{\sqrt{R'}}{\sqrt{R_0-R'}}dR' \rightarrow \int_{\theta_1}^{\theta_2} \frac{\sqrt{R_0 \sin^2 \theta}}{\sqrt{\cos^2 \theta}} 2 R_0 \sin \theta \cos \theta d \theta.$$ When ##R'=R_0, \sin^2 \theta = 1## so that ## \theta = \pm \pi/2##. When R'=0.03, R_0=0.06, ##\sin^2 \theta = 1/2## so ##\theta \approx \pm 0.253##. Between ##\theta \in [-\pi/2, -0.253]##, we get ##\sqrt{\sin^2 \theta} = -\sin \theta## and ##\sqrt{\cos^2 \theta} = \cos \theta## Therefore have $$-2 R_0^{3/2} \int_{-\pi/2}^{-0.253} \sin^2 \theta d \theta \approx -0.0229.$$ This gives $$T \approx -0.016 \frac{1}{\sqrt{mG}}$$ With a negative in front on the rhs (as I think Chestermiller was hinting at, see below) this evaluates to about 28s.

Chestermiller said:
What do you think is wrong with this equation?
I think it implies that R grows with t rather than gets smaller so I need a -ve in front on the rhs.
 
kuruman said:
Are you sure about the 1/2 on the left side of the equation where you solve for v? If you view this as essentially an energy conservation equation with the change in kinetic energy on the left and the change in potential energy on the right, the 1/2 assumes that only one sphere moves instead of both.
I think I am just stating that the kinetic energy gain of one of the spheres is through the change in its potential from ##R_0## to ##R##.
 
CAF123 said:
I think it implies that R grows with t rather than gets smaller so I need a -ve in front on the rhs.
Yes. That is correct. The negative root is the one to use.
 
@Chestermiller, thanks :) is there any physics behind the positive root and do you agree with the answer I derived of 28s?
At the instant of collision, the speeds of the spheres will be zero and then so as to conserve momentum the spheres will start going in opposite directions...so the positive root entails this part of the motion?
 
  • #10
CAF123 said:
@Chestermiller, thanks :) is there any physics behind the positive root and do you agree with the answer I derived of 28s?
At the instant of collision, the speeds of the spheres will be zero and then so as to conserve momentum the spheres will start going in opposite directions...so the positive root entails this part of the motion?
The force balance, rather than the energy balance, should tell you which sign to use for dR/dt. I think your conclusion regarding the separation of the bodies following the collision is correct.
EDIT: Actually, after further consideration , the negative sign still applies. But there is an initial condition that needs to be included in the equation.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
drvrm said:
i was wondering about limits of R as initially the centres are one meter apart?
one can take the grav. pull keeping the mass at the centre as equivalent positions!
no doubt the collision will take place as the spheres will touch each other i.e. when the centers are at 2 times the radius...

haruspex said:
Right, but you have not shown your steps after that, so we cannot see where you go wrong.
The force on sphere a) from sphere b) is the same force as that from a point mass at the centre of b). For this reason, I think my limits on the R' integration should be R_0=1 and R=0.94, which is the distance of the CoM's at the initial and collision times.

Are you sure about the 1/2 on the left side of the equation where you solve for v? If you view this as essentially an energy conservation equation with the change in kinetic energy on the left and the change in potential energy on the right, the 1/2 assumes that only one sphere moves instead of both.
Yes, disregard my previous post in reply to you -> R is the relative separation of the masses so dR/dt=2v, thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Chestermiller said:
The force balance, rather than the energy balance, should tell you which sign to use for dR/dt. I think your conclusion regarding the separation of the bodies following the collision is correct.
EDIT: Actually, after further consideration , the negative sign still applies. But there is an initial condition that needs to be included in the equation.
Yup I see that now too. My limits for the R' integration are ##R_o = 1## and ##R=0.94##. With the negative in place and using dR/dt=2v and proceeding through with the analysis I obtain T=421s. The maximum acceleration of a sphere is right before it collides, when R=0.94. Assuming this largest value of acceleration throughout the whole motion from release from rest to collision will provide a lower bound on the total time to collision, T. This comes out at about 398s. So I want to find T such that 398 < T < 425...My value of 421 satisfies this so I think my working is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K