Time & Temperature: Proportional or Inverse?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shina
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between time and temperature, concluding that time is neither directly proportional nor inversely proportional to temperature. Participants argue that time flows independently of temperature changes, emphasizing that temperature does not inherently change with time. They highlight that while mathematical equations may suggest a relationship, these do not reflect physical reality. The consensus is that time and temperature are distinct concepts that do not influence each other in a direct manner.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with mathematical relationships and equations
  • Knowledge of temperature measurement (e.g., Celsius scale)
  • Concept of energy transfer and its effect on temperature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the laws of thermodynamics and their implications on time and temperature
  • Study the concept of heat transfer and its relation to temperature changes
  • Explore mathematical modeling in physics to understand relationships between variables
  • Investigate the concept of time in physics, including theories of relativity
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of physics, educators teaching thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the fundamental concepts of time and temperature relationships.

shina
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hey I m new here. I hope u all will cooperate with me.
As I have read much about proportionality in science. So can I say that when time increases temperature also inreases or decreases. So time is proportional or inversely proportional to temperature.
 
Science news on Phys.org
shina said:
Hey I m new here. I hope u all will cooperate with me.
As I have read much about proportionality in science. So can I say that when time increases temperature also inreases or decreases. So time is proportional or inversely proportional to temperature.
Time just flows right along regardless of temperature so expressing that time is dependent on something like temperature is definitely looking at things backward.

You can play with equations so that the MATH looks that way, but that doesn't represent reality. You can't change temperature and automatically have time be forced to change.

Besides all of that, temperature does NOT necessarily change with time in general. Be more specific about what temperature you are talking about.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shina
Yaa
phinds said:
Time just flows right along regardless of temperature so expressing that time is dependent on something like temperature is definitely looking at things backward.

You can play with equations so that the MATH looks that way, but that doesn't represent reality. You can't change temperature and automatically have time be forced to change.

Besides all of that, temperature does NOT necessarily change with time in general. Be more specific about what temperature you are talking about.
Yaa I m truly satisfied with u
Actually we don't know anything about time. Think about the period when nothing was there. At that period the concept of time was not introduced. Now u don't know any single thing about time. But u can feel when it is hot it is afternoon, cool then it may be day or night. Here u can feel different weather. Now u can conclude that for x period u feel warm or cold. So here in x period the temperature was y. Here don't ever think of current timing. Now u will find that x is propotional to y,s is propotional to z and so on. X and s are some period (time) and y and z are temperature. Hence I can say that time is either proportional or is inversely propotional to temp
 
shina said:
Hence I can say that time is either proportional or is inversely propotional to temp
I say again, this is only correct as far as a math equation goes. It has no bearing on reality.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shina
phinds said:
I say again, this is only correct as far as a math equation goes. It has no bearing on reality.
But by using similar methods many theories are formed. I m also fully satisfied with you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Take a container of something, let's say just a bottle of water, at a given temperature, say 20C.
Now place the container in box which has air maintained at 20C and leave it there for a week, or years if you like.
What temperature do you suppose the water will be when you take it out of the box?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shina
rootone said:
Take a container of something, let's say just a bottle of water, at a given temperature, say 20C.
Now place the container in box which has air maintained at 20C and leave it there for a week, or years if you like.
What temperature do you suppose the water will be when you take it out of the box?
I hope it will remain same
 
shina said:
I hope it will remain same
Yes, so the passing of time is unrelated to the temperature.
You could of course start with water at 20C and heat it to be 30C, and this will take a certain amount of time.
However that time will be dependent on the amount of energy being applied, it will get warm much quicker if warmed by a microwave oven than it will if warmed by a candle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shina
rootone said:
Yes, so the passing of time is unrelated to the temperature.
You could of course start with water at 20C and heat it to be 30C, and this will take a certain amount of time.
However that time will be dependent on the amount of energy being applied, it will get warm much quicker if warmed by a microwave oven than it will if warmed by a candle.
yes this is a correct example. But how do u know what the time is. Let us take time = x and temperature = y and it is stable. Now I can write x is proportional to time because time is never stable it will go on increasing. And if time will increase then automatically temp will decrease as compare to time. Thus I can say time is proportional or inversely proportional to temp
 
  • #10
Thread closed temporarily. @shina please check your inbox.

Edit: the thread is reopened
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrSteve

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K