Timeless Path Integral: Dah-Wei Chiou's Latest Paper

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Dah-Wei Chiou's latest paper on the timeless path integral in the context of loop quantum gravity (LQG) and loop quantum cosmology (LQC). Participants explore the implications of Chiou's work, its connections to existing theories, and the mathematical interpretations of path integrals versus curve integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express interest in Chiou's paper, noting its relevance to ongoing discussions in the LQG community.
  • One participant suggests that the term "curve integral" might be more appropriate than "path integral," emphasizing the mathematical independence from parameterization.
  • A question is raised about whether the curve discussed in Chiou's work is on a manifold, prompting a reference to another paper for comparison.
  • Another participant acknowledges the significance of the referenced paper but does not provide a direct comparison with Chiou's work.
  • One participant mentions their own analysis, suggesting a connection to Chiou's work, though details are not elaborated.
  • There is a light-hearted exchange regarding the identity of a participant, with comments on the perception of their work as "crazy" and discussions about name pronunciation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express interest in Chiou's work, but there are varying interpretations and connections drawn to other papers. The discussion includes differing perspectives on terminology and the implications of the research, indicating that multiple views remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific mathematical concepts and papers, but the discussion does not resolve the connections or implications of these references. The terminology used (path integral vs. curve integral) remains a point of contention.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
==quote from Dah-Wei Chiou's latest paper==
In the research of loop quantum gravity (LQG), the sum-over-histories formulation is an active research area that goes under the name “spin foam models” (SFMs) (see [9] and references therein for LQG and SFMs). In particular, over the past years, SFMs in relation to the kinematics of LQG have been clearly established [11–14]. However, the Hamiltonian dynamics of LQG is far from fully understood, and although well motivated, SFMs have not been systematically derived from any well-established theories of canonical quantum gravity. Meanwhile, loop quantum cosmology (LQC) has recently been cast in a sum-over-histories formulation, providing strong support for the general paradigm underlying SFMS [15, 16]. In this paper, the timeless path integral is systematically derived from the canonical formalism of relativistic quantum mechanics, and we hope it will shed new light on the issues of the interplay between LQG/LQC and SFMs.
==endquote==

I like Chiou's work. It was his July paper on Unimodular Loop Quantum Cosmology that prompted me to start the "Unigrav" thread (about Unimodular Gravity) that has been quite active recently. Here is Chiou's Timeless Path Integral paper:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.5436
Timeless path integral for relativistic quantum mechanics
Dah-Wei Chiou
30 pages
(Submitted on 28 Sep 2010)
"Starting from the canonical formalism of relativistic (timeless) quantum mechanics, the formulation of timeless path integral is rigorously derived. The transition amplitude is reformulated as the sum, or functional integral, over all possible paths in the constraint surface specified by the (relativistic) Hamiltonian constraint, and each path contributes with a phase identical to the classical action divided by \hbar. The timeless path integral manifests the timeless feature as it is completely independent of the parametrization for paths. For the special case that the Hamiltonian constraint is a quadratic polynomial in momenta, the transition amplitude admits the timeless Feynman's path integral over the (relativistic) configuration space."

Almost all the first 16 references are to LQG community stuff. You can see the references peppered through the paragraph I quoted at the start of this post. What he is doing seems highly relevant.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could call it a "curve integral" instead of a path integral. In math a curve is defined independently of parameterization. Same object as a path, basically, just not interpreted as the path of a particle moving in time.
See footnote #9 on page 22.
 
Yes it is, so I think. And that looks like a very distinguished paper, much cited over the years. Compare it with Dah-Wei Chiou's I can not at the moment. Want to draw some connections yourself?
 
Oh, you are Nikolic! You have very crazy stuff out there! :)
 
MTd2 said:
Oh, you are Nikolic! You have very crazy stuff out there! :)

It's obvious that you mean that as a profound compliment, MTd2.
I've often wondered about the proper anglicization of Hrvoje's first name is. I think it might be "Harvey".
 
marcus said:
It's obvious that you mean that as a profound compliment, MTd2.
Well, many people find my work crazy in a negative sense too. :biggrin:

marcus said:
I've often wondered about the proper anglicization of Hrvoje's first name is. I think it might be "Harvey".
It is something like "her"+"voyea".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K